Friday, July 30, 2010

 

Eureka moment

Woke up to an important realisation. I have been wondering for some time why water companies are moving into domestic buildings maintenance and it has finally dawned on me why.

Water companies have always been into building, that is to say into digging up roads in order to install their pipes and drains. So not quite the same as domestic buildings maintenance, but they do know the game. More recently they have been into call centres and call management. You call them about your water problem and they manage that problem to completion. Maybe with a lot of press 5 if your water problem is in your back garden but it does get done. So, not a big move for them to move into taking calls about your leaking tap, draughty window or leaking roof. They have all the infrastructure needed to deal with this sort of thing. And from your point of view, the customer, all you have to do is ring them up. Any time of day or night. They will always answer the phone and eventually a van will pull up outside your house. They will probably ring you up a week later to ask if they can close the call. And you would not mind paying a premium for this sort of service.

No more ringing round small builders who may or may not answer the phone and who may or may not turn up, depending on the state of their social life and/or order book. No more feeling guilty about paying them cash to avoid paying the VAT. Said small builders must have been much helped by the arrival of mobile phones which makes them much more reachable. But I think they had better watch it. The water companies of the world might start to take a significant proportion of their business. Just look how Tesco has muscled into the village shop business.

Nearer home I had a small complaint to make of the Surrey Library service. They sold me a book about the bourgeois experience of pleasure (of the arty sort) which was classified GRE. I have been puzzling for some weeks now about what on earth GRE might stand for and yesterday got around to going back to the library to find out. The lady behind the desk was able to tell me, without consulting her notes, that GRE stood for the history and geography of Great Britain. Which is all very well but the book in question might be described as European cultural history. So a very sloppy piece of classification.

The book itself was interesting. I am not sure if I am sufficiently moved to read the other 4 volumes of the series but I was moved to learn about the serial abuse of the term bourgeois by artists. It seems that bourgeois is a sort of general purpose hate word for many artists, in the same way as it was for lefties of my generation. This despite the fact that it is the cultured bourgeois who, by and large, fund arty activity. Cultured aristos. have not been big players in the arty field for some hundreds of years and the working classes never have been. So, for example, I learn that Flaubert was a particularly virulent bourgeoisophobe.

Perhaps it is the touchiness of creative types about their creations. They have to have buyers of their creations in order to put bread in their mouths. But they hate the dependence and they hate having to put up with learned chatter about their creations by others. They hate having their stuff pawed over by the great unwashed. At least I think I would. I remember asking an artist once how she put up with such learned chatter and she said you just get used to it. Doesn't bother you after a while.

Also true that you need the discipline of having to sell to keep your work reasonably on the straight and narrow and not completely self indulgent and incomprehensible to others. One needs the framework of a commission to stimulate the creative juices. Sadly, a necessary but not sufficient condition to judge by the amount of rubbish that gets sold.

Thursday, July 29, 2010

 

Millenium post

Entirely appropriate that I should reach this important milestone - my 1,000th post - while visiting the green fairy (see above). We shall see what I can manage in the morning.

 

Rocks

I was rather shocked to read the other week that in Iran, that seat of ancient civilisation, they still go in for stoning people. Which in the case of women seems to mean burying them up to their necks (one would not want their breasts to be accidentally exposed during the proceedings. They are also given a ritual bath before the off to make sure that they arrive, wherever they are headed, in as pure a state as possible), and then chucking half brick size rocks at them for the ten minutes or so it takes to do them in. One wonders what sort of people volunteer to do the chucking? I seem to remember that when St Margaret of Clitherow of York was pressed to death, a nearly as unpleasant way of doing people in, the city fathers hired a few vagrants to do the dirty work.

This brought on by reading today in the Iliad that chucking rocks was certainly a normal battlefield activity during the Greek bronze age. Although in this case, the bigger the better. The idea was to kill, not to cause pain. Presumably, if one lives in an arid country where there are plenty of rocky plains on which to have battles and at a time when proper spears and what have you were rather expensive items, chucking rocks was a sensible alternative. A real hero could chuck a 25kg rock 25 metres.

And I now remember that competitive (rather than lethal) rock chucking also figures in the Icelandic section of the Neibelungenlied. Perhaps the rocks there come from rivers rather than plains. Certainly plenty of rocks in rivers in the Scottish highlands, maybe the nearest thing to Iceland to hand.

Yesterday evening to Richmond Theatre where we have another instance of the numbers game reported on yesterday. In this instance we have a one man show put on by Simon Callow, the programme for which features 12 credits beyond his and a total of 15 more people. OK, so it is rather an elaborate one man show taking in a dozen or more venues over several months, but interesting to see the amount of space the show dressers get. Direction, design, lights, music, video, production, stage and management, with some of these attracting more than one credit. But I suppose it would be wrong to mourn the passing of some simpler age when it was enough for the chap to stand up and spout. Audiences have always gone for fancy stage effects and that takes fancy people to put them on. Certainly since the fancy masques of the Elizabethans and Jacobeans.

Show itself a tour-de-force, in that one man of about my age is performing for a couple of hours with just one short break. His ability to speak several roles at once - the rehearsal scene in 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' - was most impressive. But being able to switch between role and voice like that is a very strange ability. Could you trust a man that can flip that fast? And I learned that the Bard had, by later standards, a short working life. Less than thirty years. And that he retired in good order, displaced by newer men, to mind his goods and chattels in Stratford, to be quietly buried in the church where he was christened.

House more or less full, not bad for summer mid week. Theatre a grand purpose built affair including the local library from the last but one century, with plenty of fancy (red) brick work outside and plenty of fancy plaster and papier-mache inside. Next time I need a GSCE geography project, I might try and map London's suburban theatres. Where are the proper theatres like that at Richmond, rather than the new-build affairs of Epsom, Leatherhead, Guildford and Woking? When is it theatres rather than music halls?

But, leaving the venue aside, not really the sort of thing I enjoy. Never been keen on medleys, greatest hits and great moments things. I prefer to consume the stuff in the sort of chunks in which it was produced - in this case plays (leaving aside the sonnets). This way one's mood is controlled and moves in the way intended. There is a performance. One is not jumping here, there and everywhere. Switching between roles might be hard for the performer, but jumping around the oeuvre is also a bit hard on the listener.

There is also the point that the greatest moments never seem so great when taken out of context. They are great because of where they are, not just because of what they are.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

 

Back to basics

I read something in yesterday's DT about how if we only have 1 policeman out of 10 on the streets at any one time we have clearly lost our way. Time to sack all the chief constables and try again with another lot. Which prompted me to wonder whether the DT writers are about as bad at sums as they seem to think all those likely lads and lasses coming out of bog-standard comprehensives are.

My sums go like this.

Let's start with 10 policemen.

There are 168 hours in a week and we like our policemen to work 40 hours a week. So if we want 1 policeman on the beat all the time and two some of the time we need 5 of our 10 policemen.

Most personnel people think that other people ought to have both holiday leave and sick leave. Policing is a fairly high stress business so let's allow 40 days per policeman per working year for leave. That's another policeman.

Most managers think that there ought to be management, administration and paperwork. Making sure that Fred is not dossing in some pub all day when he is supposed to be out pounding the streets. Keeping proper records of incidents. Writing out charge sheets that will stand up to an unfriendly QC in court. That sort of thing. Not really the thing to be subbed out to half-baked civilians, so let's allow another policeman to do that. Taking the total so far to 7.

Custom says that 50% of policework is glorified social work. Attending to domestic assaults & skirmishes, deaths and the deranged. Presumably custom means 50% of what is left after overheads. Say 4. Which takes us well over the top to 11. And we have not yet done traffic, forensics, scene of crime, crime detection (the Sherlock Holmes end of the business), the rest of crime prevention or public relations.

So not quite as easy as the DT would have us believe.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

 

Be careful where you pass over!

Because if you do it in Shoreditch there may be a slight delay. Anon.

 

BP*2

Wake up this morning to the news that Greenpeace has shut down BP petrol stations across London, news which is confirmed by the Sky web site which also contains a selection of twitters, mostly against some for.

I cast my vote against. My story is that Greenpeace have a record of inappropriately peaceless protest. They have their view and they are fully entitled to peaceful protest within the law. This does not include flagrant disregard for the seaway code (when they are on whale hugging missions) or the vandalism of petrol stations. I am reminded of the occasion when a bunch of anti-GM people burnt down a field of GM maize and were acquitted by a Norwich jury. I never heard of the farmer concerned getting any compensation for the loss of his field, presumably a few thousand pounds worth. I don't suppose that, taking all the present circumstances into account, BP will feel able to throw the legal book at Greenpeace, which I imagine that, legally, they could.

I ought to declare some background here, in that as a youngster I used to protest, not altogether peacefully and not altogether within the law, although I still believe in the causes - nuclear disarmament and the Vietnam war. Rather more serious matters at the time than the fate of a few verminous foxes. And those who do not believe or condone might still euphemise the behaviour as youthful high spirits (or possibly low spirits), rather different to the corporate vandalism endorsed by the corporate suits of Greenpeace senior management.

On the other hand, BP have rather shot themselves in the foot with the package the DT claims that their about to depart chief executive will be getting. In the olden days one used to hear moans about civil servants who committed the most awful blunders resulting in much grief in the country at large and who were only sanctioned to the extent that they were retired early on grounds of limited efficiency. Possibly with pension pot made up to the full 40 years. Nowadays, similar arrangements appear to be made for those inhabiting the higher reaches of what was supposed to be a jungle, red in tooth and claw. Survival of the fittest and all that.

I dare say the chief executive concerned is only claiming what he is legally entitled to, but I think that he is wrong to insist on his rights in this way. BP and the world have had a major disaster on his watch and he should be seen to take a bit of pain - along with all those shareholders, widows who have trusted their widow's mite to him. Civil service pension pots used to be fairly modest; not that such that one likely to shout fat cat. But this chap is walking away with millions. Given that he probably already has millions, why does he not do a bit of public humble pie and waive most of his rights? Just keep enough to buy a new hair shirt from time to time? After a few years all will be forgotten if not forgiven and he will be able to get his poncy yacht out again.

Against all that, it used to be the custom in the olden days for defeated generals to be honourably pensioned off by the victorious generals. Never mind all the chaps that went down in the defeat. Part of the thinking being that if generals knew that they would get the chop if they lost, they might get a bit reckless with the lives of others when the going got rough.

Clearly time to visit the baker.

Monday, July 26, 2010

 

Who pays?

Our road has been very concerned since the start of the year about our holes. Apparently we had the wrong sort of rain at the end of the year before, which did terrible things to the road's foundations and now we have lots of holes, along with lots of other roads in the county (Surrey).

One informant explained that the county budget for hole mending is very severely stretched and that it was going to take a good while before they got around to mending our holes properly, although some of them have now been mended improperly, that is to say by just banging in some of the black stuff but without bothering to cut the hole out properly. Rather like doing a filling by just banging some amalgam on top of the rotting hole, rather than cutting out all the rot and making a nice hole for the amalgam to key into.

In the meanwhile, various people have driven their cars too fast over unmended holes thereby doing the bottom of their cars some damage. They have sued Surrey, who have settled by drawing money out of the hole mending budget for next year. The money has to come from somewhere. But not a sustainable solution, particularly since global warming means that the wrong sort of rain is going to be more common and spending cuts mean that the budget is going to be more small.

My initial take on all this was that if, collectively, we choose not to give the council enough money to mend the roads with, is it really fair if we then complain, to the extent of suing them, when the holes do not get mended?

But the car has been damaged and maybe does need to be mended. First port of call is me as I should not have driven my car over a hole, in a road which I should of known was riddled with holes, so fast. Second port of call is my insurance company. Not sure what they would do about this sort of damage. Does fully comprehensive include damage caused by careless driving? Would they just cough up to avoid bother until and unless there got to be a lot of claims of this sort? Third port of call is the government. That well known insurer of last resort. If something terrible happens which none of us bothered to take out insurance for, poor old government has to cough up. But it can only cough up if we have previously coughed up the necessaries. Paid our insurance premiums in another way if you like. Otherwise poor old government has to borrow off the Chinese who might get a bit fed up with it after a while and start a run on our bond market.

Of course, all else failing, we might get legal, which is where we started. Hire some expensive lawyer to demonstrate that Surrey had a contract with me to make my roads safe and sound and that they were in breach. Damages, punitive and otherwise indicated. Lawyer plus £250,00; me plus £50,000; Surrey minus £300,000. They broke the law, they have to pay. I don't care that it makes no sense in the grand scheme of things or that the lawyer does better out of it than I do. I just want revenge and retribution.

So more generally, what duty does Surrey have to honour its duties and obligations? If it enters into a contract with a geriatric care provider and defaults, I guess the provider is entitled to sue. But does it enter into a contract with me in the same way? It would seem sensible for any such contract to include weasel words to the effect 'best endeavours, funding permitting'. In the current climate I would have thought it foolish and wrong for a council to enter into any binding undertaking to do anything. It is just going to do the best it can. And if we don't like it we can chuck them out at the next election and let some other lot have a go. But we don't sue them. That's not sporting.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

 

Heroes

Spent the first part of the holiday re-reading Hatto's version of 'The Nibelungenlied'. Truly a tremendous thing - particularly so given that it is a prose translation of a poem. Odd that I have never come across it before. Perhaps a result of the schools of my day preferring Latin and Ancient Greek to Ancient German.

So visiting the second hand book shop at the top of Ryde was pleased to come across a copy of Pope's Iliad and Odyssey, heroic poems of the Ancient Greek variety. Along with a duplicate Arden 'Love's Labour Lost' (£2), a learned monograph about Aldous Huxley - including a chunk on Huxley and Lawrence, the latter being a topic of present interest on which I shall report in due course and a slim volume of essays by Huxley which I have never read and which I do not think I have ever owned. But the ageing mind can't be too sure about such things. All in all, a good haul.

Particularly when we come to open the Pope, which had been sold, probably more than a hundred years ago by Whiteley of Westbourne Grove. The book is inscribed by one Gladys Courtenay. The same page tells me that 'Arthur Cohen := Friendship & Love' and 'Gladys Courtenay := Friendship & Love'. In pencil. The things that people got up to before they had Facebook and Twitter. There are also various instructions in pencil, in more than one old fashioned hand, to turn to various pages. So on page 20 there is the rather incomplete instruction 'get your hair cut'. On page 127 the inscription 'Reggie Courtenay is a beastly little fool'. Another hand has crossed out Reggie and inserted Gladys. On page 260 'you have got big legs and arms like your mother'. And after a short sequence of directions, on page 562 'sold again'. No doubt I shall find other gems as I work my way through.

I note in passing that not only do the Courtenays deface their books, they also do not bother to cut all the pages and some of the pages look to have been cut, very messily, with a finger rather than a knife. Clearly not brought up to have a proper respect for books.

Turning to the matter itself, a much livelier read than I remember from the Rieu version I read as a child. Presumably takes more liberties with the original in order to squeeze it into rhyming couplets. Two comments so far relative to 'The Neibelungenlied'. First, the Iliad has a much bigger place for gods. Second, it has a more modern attitude to heroic violence - despite having been written getting on for 2,000 years earlier. That is to say, that it is not really a good thing even if it does involve some admirable qualities like bravery and make for a good story.

I have been puzzling over the illustrations, which appear to be small line engravings, a lot of them of updraped men and women. Was it these that made the book popular? The puzzle is, that the illustrations are printed along with the text. In which case, according to my understanding of printing science, they have to be woodcuts. You can't print engravings along with letterpress, the two processes of ink transfer being entirely different. Was it some sort of lithographic process? I shall have to find someone who knows more about these matters than I do.

Saturday, July 24, 2010

 

Round up on the holiday grub

The 14 days away can be accounted for in the following fashion.

3 days to the 'Dark Horse', an eating pub said to be under new management. Good line in vegetables which appear to be cooked on demand. Meal 1, was sunday lunch (lamb), which was substantial but the meat component of which seemed to be meat that had been cooked and sliced some time previously, rejuvenated with a powerful dose of hot Bisto. Meal 2, was Bembridge crab mornay, which meant 2 scallop shells, one containing prawns topped with a cheesy sauce and grilled and one containing (white) crab topped with a cheesy sauce and grilled. Tasted better than it sounds. Meal 3, moved into a higher gear altogether with mackerel, something the man from Hastings does not do very often. Two smallish mackerels each, which appeared to have been caught earlier in the day. Rather sketchily cleaned and grilled with a topping of garlic and butter. Not bad at all but they would have done better to have cleaned the things a bit more thoroughly and to have omitted the butter and garlic.

3 days chicken. Organically reared and suitable for vegetarians. One day hot, one day cold, one day in the pot two days old. Traditional chicken soup with barley as it turned out that one can procure pearl barley in the Isle of Wight. An island which, we learn, was rather independent, in the way of the Isle of Man or the Channel Islands, until the middle of the 13th century when the lady of the island chucked her lot in with the chap in charge on the mainland. Richard II I think. I guess that, from his point of view, independent meant far too good a spring board for interference in his affairs.

2 days spag. bol. - the buy mince and stir in sauce variety. The first time we have ever done such a thing. BH made herself feel a bit better about it by adding an onion. Not as flavourful as we had feared although we were not sure why the manufacturers found it necessary to include sugar in the sauce. We never do.

1 day pie and chips.

1 day veggie; new potatoes and broad beans.

1 day meat pie and veggie; new potatoes and broad beans. Pie from a stall up the village, not bad at all.

1 day paella, or at least something sold by that name in the 'Ryde Castle'. We knew that it was going to be boil in the bag, but had thought it would be better than it was. Not helped by a distinctly sour flavour. No idea where that came from although cheap tinned tomatoes can give things odd flavours. Oddly enough, they made up a bit with quite a decent cheesecake. Might even have been cooked rather than jello'd.

1 day pork soup, more or less Epsom recipe with tenderloin from a butcher in Ventnor. Not a bad butcher despite having to double up as a grocer to make ends meet. Added some scraped new potatoes and used rather less cabbage than usual. Decided that I was not very keen on cast iron cooking pots. Le Creusott? Far too heavy and this one had a scarred bottom. Couldn't even be sure that one's soup was not going to catch. Furthermore, the knob on the lid, the thing one used for lifting the lid, was most unhygenic. The knob - which could get very hot - was a bit loose despite its screw being unmoveable - and the open joint was full of dark brown gunk which one could not clean out.

1 day lobster. Two cooked but entire lobsters from Bembridge, £15 a pop. Very nice they were too - although I am not sure that I would bother too often at that price. Served with vin blank de chile via co-op. A Carmen Gewerztraminer which I rather liked. See http://www.carmen.com. Followed by Ryde's finest chocolates, that is to say an organic truffle selection from Thorntons. I thought they were a bit dear, relative to what the £10 would have bought in M&S or Waitrose. Maybe we should have gone for the two big boxes of milk chocolates knocked down to £3 for 2, but that seemed a bit sus..

Having done that lot, thought to settle down in front of the Sky-enabled giant telly that came with the holiday cottage, only to find that the top 5 channels all had ladies' programmes. A docu-drama about a Victorian chemist plus 4 reality TV jobs. A chap creeping round hotels, a chap creeping round his own factories, a home from hell (whatever that might be) and a vet. About time they retired all these pushy lady programme controllers and brought back some Maigret - to name one decent series which could do with another airing. Or maybe they could give us the French version with sub-titles for a change. There must be one. And if it is done by Belgians - where the chap came from after all - one might even be able to understand it.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

 

Watch yer back Trace!

Two arty snippets caught the eye. Firstly, a lady sculptor (sculptress?) sees fit to suspend a disused fighter plane, covered in deeply significantly graffitti of her own confection, from the dome inside Tate Britain. Much chattering in the Guardian about the deep significance. Secondly, a gentleman sculptor sees fit to exhibit a pyramid of 7 undistinguished office chairs of descending size as one ascends. Note the magic number 7. Much chattering in the Guardian about the deep significance. Trace had clearly better watch her back. Keen and hungry new talent is nipping her no longer impoverished heels. Perhaps it really is time for her to push off to her retirement boozer in the country. I'm told she likes a drop so she can contribute to the local economy by drinking up the takings.

Yesterday to Havenstreet for our biennial circumnavigation of the Valerian Sun Club (a search finds the place fast enough; for some reason the link will not paste between panes of Internet Explorer. Maybe a wrinkle of council defensive software). Carefully screened with lots of brush wood, a plaque from the twenties with the name and what looks like a new-since-our-last-visit gate. Maybe the place is still alive and kicking. Are all the members from the twenties, a time I believe to be the heyday of such establishments?

Start off at Firestone Copse and head south into Havenstreet before doing an anticlockwise swing down to the foot of the central downs and back again. Firestone Copse notable for its groves of very tall pine trees, maybe two feet in diameter waist height. Havenstreet notable as being a stop on the steam railway and for being well supplied with senior and/or nursing facilities. Northbrook House, a large Victorian affair, clearly built as an institution, not on mental hospital scale and apparently without any kind of garden for people to sit in. Holmdale House, a somewhat smaller Victorian affair, possibly built as an institution. But Mr G., apart from confirming that they are indeed senior and/or nursing facilities tells me nothing about the buildings, a pity as they are both interesting. Perhaps Havenstreet was the geriatric ghetto for the Ryde area.

On the way we are reminded that the BH is rather better at fields full of frisky cows than I am. Stands firm and waits for them to push off whereas I lurk in the background. On the other hand I do eventually pluck up courage to extend arms and waggle them up and down a bit - one with stick - a wheeze which seems to encourage pushing off. BH says that her stronger nerves are all down to the quality time in her youth spent in the vicinity of cows on Exminster Marshes.

The Ashey Down sea mark visible for most of the walk. And a strange black banana on a pole visible for a good part of it. A banana made of some shiny black material, maybe 10 feet long and 2 feet wide at the widest point, erected end-up on the top of a flexi pole maybe 30 feet high. The thing sways about in the wind and is visible from miles around. After the walk we went to inspect the thing to find access barred by 'Private Keep Out' signs. A resident thought it might be a trial run for something in advertising, having been there now for a month or so. Did they get planning permission? Is it actually something in art? A rehearsal for the next Turner prize?

Most of the few people we met appeared, from their accents, to be retired from the Home Counties. Which might explain why we came across several large gardens in the middle of nowhere protected by neat, high and carefully clipped hedges. Maybe they want to be able to do a bit of Valerian in the privacy of their own homes.

The walk was, inter alia, the inaugural outing of the new-to-us Jarrolds 'Short Walks for the Isle of Wight'. Subtitled, suitable for seniors. A useful little book, full of all sorts of factlets to enliven one's walk. Nice little maps, taken from Ordnance Survey but slightly larger scale than Landranger. The only catch being that the walk was a bit tricky and one had to keep the book open and one's eye on the stiles if one was not to go off piste. Or, even worse, into a cow field.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

 

Good and bad

Good that New Labour provided the funds for every library in the land, never mind how small, to provide more or less free access to the internet. But bad that in remoter parts of the land that the connection leaves a lot to be desired. Isle of Wight not up to the standards of metropolitan Epsom. The private sector operation in a Newport backstreet does much better - but then they charge.

Amused this morning to read that the Tories are thinking that maybe we cannot afford a new trident. I remember marching against the bomb more than 40 years ago, in company with various hard lefties, at a time when disarmament by the UK might have meant something. In those days we were still thought of as a great power, even if that was already an illusion. Nowadays, I think the symbolic value of our disarmament is much reduced. We are left with value for money. Ironic that it takes profligacy by the nearest we have to a party of the left, which was very keen on bombs, to prompt the party of the right to ban the bomb. I suppose it is another example of the political truth that a party suspected of being wet about something has to be very dry about it. Whereas a party trusted with the something can wash it down the plug hole.

Yesterday to the beach at Yaverland for the fourth time. Nice summer's day with plenty of sun and enough breeze to stop one overheating. Despite being the only person on the beach to make use of a parasol to keep the sun off me, I still managed glowing shoulders this morning, having forgotten how easy it is to catch the sun while swimming. Probably also the only person on the beach to own a Mount Gay umbrella. We spent part of the day wondering idly where it might of come from. Had some intrepid soul brought it all the way from Barbabos or had a less intrepid soul gathered it up on some well watered promotion in some London hotel? Marching down the beach with it later in the afternoon, noticed that a tear had started at the end of one of the ribs. Luckily, we found a small tangle of rope from which I was able to extract a few threads with which, together with the trusty Laguiole hunting knife, I was able to effect emergency repairs. It holds together but I think we will have to think about replacement on return to the big town. Maybe the next bank holiday car booter at Hook Road Arena will do our business.

Returned home to continue battle with Iris Murdoch, having acquired her first novel - 'Under the net' - from a tea hut at the southern end of Sandown beach and a much later novel - 'The message to the planet' - from a charity shop in East Cowes. I might say that the tea hut offered much better value. Now Iris Murdoch is someone of whom I am aware but whom I have made very little effort to read. I believe my mother did, although the evidence is wanting. Have now read most of the first book and a little of the second, and have decided that I neither like her style nor her subject matter. She is far too keen on dragging philosophy into the story and far too keen on writing about very odd people with very odd preoccupations. With complicated private lives and considerable taste for fags and booze. The chattering classes of her day. Give me the working classes any day.

I think she taught philosophy at Oxford, so she must have been some good at it. Good enough for any learned papers to survive? Or does her PhD moulder unread with all the thousands of others in the depths of the university library?

Closed with a few jars of 'Holy Joe', a rather thick local ale, in the 'Wheatsheaf'. Good pint enlivened by deep conversation about the merits of the various charity shops in the area. It was clearly a subject of some import.

Saturday, July 17, 2010

 

Sea mark

Yesterday a veggie day with island new potatoes and broad beans for tea. Very nice they were too, the only catch being that the BH woke up to a rather pungent bean smell in the kitchen in the morning.

Compensated to some extent by the sight of a red squirrel scampering across the back lawn. Rather dark red and rather small. One can see why they get seen off by their grey cousins.

Set off to Newport bright and early, sufficiently bright and early that we worked out how to get at the sea mark on Ashey Down, something that we have seen in previous years and that we have seen several times this year but never got to.

It turns out to be an irregularly triangular, tapering masonry piller about 25 feet high and maybe 10 wide at the widest point. Sloping flat top. Bottom 8 feet painted black the rest white. Built in 1735 in the reign of good king George II, presumably as a sort of low maintenance lighthouse. From the base we could see nearly all the sea east of Wight, so presumably the ships on the see could see and navigate by the mark. Also some sea in other directions.

Considering that the thing was only 130 metres above sea level - maybe half the height of St Boniface Down - got a splendid, near 360 degree view. Removed a lump of flint as a souvenir.

Reminded to wonder how level the sea is. It is certainly not the same level all over but on earth how does one measure? Clearly a ponder for the pub.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

 

On holiday

in furthest Isle of Wight but now made it to the internet bureau in Brading Town Hall (more of which later).

Yesterday through Brading Marshes, part of which is owned by RSPB. Where there is a different take on nature preserve management to that at Epsom Common. Unlike Epsom, where the chain saw gang and the cow huggers are clearly in the ascendant, at Brading there is a stand-off between the chain saw gang and the tree huggers with the result that they have come to an agreement whereby the chain saw gang is allowed to chop down trees at one end of the preserve and the tree huggers are allowed to plant trees - including much hazel for their nuts - at the other end. Part of the mix here is the preservation of red squirrels.

There were also quite a few older hazels, but none of them were very big and most of which had stolls cluttered with feeble new growth. Perhaps the only way to get a big hazel is to manage the thing oneself; nature is not going to make it by herself.

Lots of birds, including buzzards, sky larks and sparrows, none of which pop up very often at Epsom. But irritatingly, lots of birds which I could not identify. By the time I could focus on them they had gone. Eye reflexes clearly slowing down, might be regarded as a species of senior moment.

Pushed onto Brading Windmill, a site of historical interest managed by the National Trust. With a bearded and knowledgeable volunteer in attendance to tell you all about it. A volunteer who could chatter about Brading windmill in particular and windmills in general for ever - but who also took cues about when to stop. Clearly a superior trusty. The windmill itself was interesting, particularly as a piece of machinery. The sort of mill where the top bit which holds the sails can rotate on the tower bit so that the sails face the wind; I forget the proper name for such a thing. Now this top bit is just sitting there: why does it not blow off on a windy day? The sails make for plenty of wind resistance, a lot more, for example, than a chimney. The sails were mounted on an iron shaft, while the shaft up the centre of the mill and which drove all the machinery was a trimmed tree trunk. Interesting to see how rotary force was transmitted between the shafts and the large wooden gears. Quite differant situation to a waggon wheel where one only has to carry weight. I learned that the mill wheels themselves come from France in an early form of flat pack. That is to say in pre-shaped lumps of a very special sort of rock which are stuck together on site with plaster of paris and tied together with an iron rim. The rather rough and ready booklet told me that the mill stones needed to be be sharpened about once a month - from which I inferred that plenty of mill stone must have got into the flour.

The whole thing had been heavily restored, which must have cost a packet. Lot of woodworm and I spotted one bit of elm.

Back to Brading via the Propellor Inn. Steak and kidney pudding, mushy peas and chips for tea, sitting next to the bull ring. Pudding was a substantial affair, said to weigh 0.75lb and coming in a sturdy white plastic pudding basin. First time I had come across this particular sort of pie. The bull ring was a large iron ring concreted into the ground. The idea was that when you wanted some beef you tied a bull by the nose to the iron ring and then baited it with dogs for a bit to bring the flavour of the meat on before slaughter. I don't think the RSPCA could have been invented at the time. Nearby was an ancient pub called the Bugle, which, so the blue sign informs us, is not a sort of trumpet, rather a sort of bull.

In fact the whole town very ancient, a genuine rotten borough. Once upon a time it was a reasonably important sea port, known to Canute and William the Conq. and people like that. So it boasts a town hall, a very old church (in foundation at least), several pubs and several very old buildings. Including the Brading Experience, now shut, the taste for this sort of display having, it seems, past.

Friday, July 09, 2010

 

A trip to town

Started off harmlessly enough at Epsom with a puzzle about a box. Maybe 750mm by 750mm by 250mm, stout cardboard affair saying Shimano all over it. The puzzle being, what exactly did the box contain. I only knew of Shimano as the manufacturer of bicycle transmission components and it was not appropriate to ask the owner of the box. Another cyclist thought that it might have been a folding bicycle but a visit to the Shimano website suggests that while they are noted manufacturers of bicycle and fishing equipment and they do sell more or less all the bits needed to make a bicycle (apart from the frame) they do not sell entire bicycles. With the exception of an e-bicycle which might be some sort of simulator. Quite a whizzy web site, but not one which makes it completely clear what it is they sell.

This kept me going until I reached the Vauxhall Griffin where I had a pint of something from Woodforde, the pull for which features a black sailed Norfolk wherry. Very nice it was too but I thought better of explaining to the pretty young barmaid that I had sailed, as a child, on the last wherry to ply the Broads, and which did, indeed, look much like the picture on the beer pull. Black sail and all. Too much information, despite the pub being more or less empty. Odd, as the last time I had visited at about the same time of day it had been full. Older readers might remember the establishment as the Builders Arms. It has been through various vicissitudes since I have known it.

We then pondered the strange news that the government of Northern Ireland has kindly loaned the Northumberland Police 20 armoured cars to help track down to lone nut case, believed to be armed with a shotgun or two. Why is it that the police always have to go to town when they start on guns? If they are that keen on playing army why on earth don't they join the army in the first place? Why are herds of them cruising around in rather motley uniforms brandishing what appear to be some kind of machine gun? Assault rifles? As a non-combatant, I would have thought the thing to deal with a lone nut case was an ordinary rifle. Something that you might actually hit something at a hundred yards with. The lone nut case is presumably feeling, assuming that he feels much at all, terribly important.

This while we observed a number of bird songs, three to be precise, in what was otherwise a surprisingly quiet and still metropolitan evening. Unfortunately, while each song was quite distinct and in principle memorable, we were unable to see the birds concerned, so were unable to label the songs. Most frustrating.

Then back to the station where I picked up a regular train to Guildford, change at Wimbledon, rather than the commuter thing I usually get. Much grander altogether and we were helpfully advised that the first class section had been declassified and that we were welcome to avail ourselves of its first class facilities at no extra charge. Perhaps the conductor was a retired civil servant used to declassifying very important government documents. Not heard the word used in any other sense before.

Changed at Wimbledon to learn that the crowd control railings are cunningly arranged so that those getting off at Platform 8 - that is to say where you might find virtually anyone much trying to head down the Southwest Trains network - cannot get at the train timetables. You have to get around the railings first. On the plus side, Southwest Trains do have a very nifty map of their network on their site, looking very like a map from Google. Maybe it is powered by the same bit of code. See http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/networkmap.aspx. Rather than wait, I thought it proper to sample a pint of Broadside at the Prince of Wales, which I was interested to learn had fairly old floors, with floorboards of various widths up to maybe 10 inches - not your modern tongue and groove at all. Perhaps more important the place is open until midnight every night with an extension until 0200 on Fridays and Saturdays. Not that many hardened topers on this night. Still, as the man at qype says, a good solid boozer with no flaws and no specialities.

Pushed onto Raynes Park to inspect the whizzy new split screen which has been installed in the middle of platform 4. See the rather tricky illustration at http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/sjp/RAY/plan.html. But before I got there, at the apex of the island between platforms 3 and 4, came across a semi circular carpet, maybe fifteen feet in diameter, of small yellowy green balls, each about 2.5mm in diameter. The freshly fallen seeds of the tree above. When I got past this phenomenon and reached the screen found it to be rather impressive. About four feet by two feet erected in a special housing up a lamp post. We thought the idea was that the guard by staring straight out of his guard door could see in one half of the split screen what was happening on the platform to the left, on the other half what was happening on the right. No need for him to climb out of the train at all. At least we presumed that was what the idea was. The only catch was that the train stopped with the guard about six feet short of the split screen, which was in consequence no use at all. I had better not repeat the comment of the guard when challenged in case his employers have a problem.

A few stars visible at Raynes Park, notable half of the Big Dipper. One of the few constellations I am reasonably sure about.

Finally make it onto the train to Epsom and entertained myself with discussing the various pronunciations of Ewell - eewell, eewellee, youell and so on - with two larger ladies who were getting off there. I also thought fit to tell them about the cheap library books to be had from Bourne Hall. Discretion and reticence of earlier in the evening having worn somewhat thin by this time.

A lot more stars visible by the time we arrived at Epsom. Not a truly clear night, something I only notice at Epsom a couple or so times a year, but clear enough to pick out a few constellations. Including the entire Big Dipper. Almost moved to fetch the bins on arrival but settled for gazing at our splendid Kashgai rug instead (ex Liberty's). A wonderful work, a thing entire in itself. A wonderfully non-referential thing. Complex, structured and beautiful without involving anything much one could name. Absolutely no need to look for meanings and interpretations. Clever chaps these Muslims when it comes to rugs and carpets.

Thursday, July 08, 2010

 

Charity continued

All three members of our household now appear to be eligible for the winter fuel payment, in consequence of which two of us separately received four pages (eight sides) of stuff from somewhere in Ashby de la Zouch (Wikipedia tells me that the Ashby bit is Danish and the Zouch bit is French), rather vaguely signed 'HM Government'.

First wonder is, what is the transaction charge associated with this modest payment - £125 in my case? A significant addition to the payment I might receive? But with transaction charges falling in future years when the money will get paid more or less automatically unless or until I remember to tell them that I am dead? Or maybe the bank will get around to doing this last.

Now given that we are not a poor household, not, as far as I am aware, eligible for income support, I thought that this was a payment I could probably manage without. So second wonder is, why is this benefit apparently being made without regard to circumstances, to all and sundry? Suggest to the assembled family that maybe I ought to drop all four pages into the shredder and make compost (inorganic) of them. Do something useful rather than adding to the national debt. This suggestion met with much opposition. Opposition which I feel is a bit misplaced. We don't mind giving to charity but we do mind giving to government (or not taking in this case), presumably on the grounds that we trust the charity to spend the money on something sensible but that we do not trust government in the same way. Which is also rather misplaced given that we allow the government to spend about half the money there is. Also given that there are a lot of pretty hopeless charities about.

There is the line I have sometimes heard that it is mainly the careful middle classes who get the most benefit from benefits of this sort. The poor are too feckless or perhaps too illiterate and the rich are too lazy. So it is just us chaps in the middle who benefit, rather than the poor who might actually need it.

There is another line that having paid one's taxes all these years, one should jolly claim what is going. One has earned it.

There is another line that benefits which are not means tested have much lower administration costs.

One response to which might be, that it is more or less impossible for government to make regulations which are fair to all comers. So the rules tend to be a bit more inclusive than they need be and it would help if those who are not in need did not push around at the boundaries. A bit of voluntary restraint would be proper. If it became a habit, the government would not need to spend so much of our money on expensive lawyers dreaming up complicated rules.

There is another line that one gets comfortable by being careful, and this includes taking what is due to one. Why should one be less comfortable than one might be, just because there are improvident tossers in the world.

There is another line that if we all make a parade of not claiming benefits, the poor who need them might be deterred from making their more legitimate claims.

Having chucked all this lot into the mix and pondered over the cup that cheers, the four pages now enter the shredder.

Followed this up by reading half of a third review (in the LRB) of the book by Fodor about evolution (see June 12th) - that is to say reading every other line rather than the first half or the second half. As far as I can make out, this review also concludes that Fodor is wrong, but does it very respectfully and politely. Whereas I read in today's Guardian (Mombiot) that journalists regularly receive thoroughly unpleasant letters and climate scientists regularly receive only slightly less unpleasant letters. There are a lot of unpleasant people out there with nothing better to do. All quite upsetting if you are normally thin skinned - to the point where said climate scientists lose their cool a bit.

But the good news is that, after the third review, the climate scientists at Norwich whose emails got pinched have been found guilty of not much worse than bad public relations. Their science emerges more or less unscathed: the world really is warming up and it would be a good idea if we did something about it.

Which, as I type, strikes me as an odd use of good news. It would be much better news if the world was not warming up. But it would be bad news of a different sort if sending hate mail about was what it took to come to that view. Clearly time for the amber nectar.

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

 

Castle time

Following our acquisition of a castle on May 3rd, sprog 1 has finally gotten around to test driving it. The test being to assemble it without any clues about what the thing looked like assembled, although I did help to the extent of tying the pieces for the four corner turrets into four bundles. He didn't do that well, needing several clues to get the hang of the tricky turrets and their connection with the rest of the castle. I did not remember until after we had had some sport about lack of castle assembly skills, that the chap who sold it to me deliberately sold the turrets in assembled form, thinking that working it out from scratch was going to be a bit to difficult for the average car-booter.

Which then leads onto discussion of when a castle is a fort, the word favoured in the Wild West. Also a French word meaning strong, although according to Littre the word is not used as a noun, meaning a castle, in French unless you stretch it out to a forteresse. OED is quite clear that a fort is a castle, has been since the 16th century and which may in North America also be a fortified trading post. North America here including Canada so perhaps the usage there is from the French Canadian.

Midday Monday to the Wigmore Hall to hear a Schostakovich violin sonata (Op. 134) and the Schubert rondo (for violin and piano) (D895), neither of which had I heard before. Performed by a Miss Josefowicz and a Mr Novacek, both of whom look to come from the US. The Shostakovich a strange and powerful (late) piece, well adapted to their very physical presentation. Posture in her case, grimaces in his. Physical turning out to be important, I do not think it would adapt very well to performance on the gramophone - a contraption which to my mind needs rather quieter pieces to work, certainly when sober. Something faintly ridiculous about listening intently to music belting out of a couple of small boxes in one's spare bedroom. Schubert good also, although it would, I think, improve with familiarity. BH very taken with both.

Odd touch from Miss Josefowicz in that she had a very flashy blue and yellow gown on (with Mr Novacek having not quite matching blue and yellow in his shirt), but she had pasted the music for a chunk of the Shostakovich onto a large sheet of cardboard torn from a cardboard box. This to avoid the need to turn the pages. She must have had very good eyesight - or memory or both - as she was standing maybe 4 feet from the music - a distance at which it would be of little use to me.

BH sufficiently stirred up after the concert to pass up the opportunity to patronise the shops in Oxford Street. So a little pick-me-up in the Toucan in Wimpole Street, followed by a stroll through town, down to Waterloo Station. Taking in one small park (St James Square) and one large large park (St James Park). Very nice they were too, although the lake in St James Park was badly infested with blanket weed, covering maybe half its extent. Failed to buy a map of the Thames against an upcoming river trip from the giant Waterstones in what used to be Simpsons.

A place where I remember, many years ago, taking my late father's cashmere coat to be relined and having it spread out on a giant wooden table while the tailor in full fig tut-tutted about the sad condition of the lining. He also made something of the fact that while the coat did indeed carry the Simpson label, it had not actually been sold out of the Piccadilly shop. A near fatal fact, and in the event relining was deemed to be uneconomic, despite the hefty price tag of such a thing new.

PS: Mr G. has interpreted my warblings about castles as a desire to stay in the Castle Rock hotel in Colorado. Interesting minds these search engines.

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

 

Shrewsbury Lamb

I record, for the record as it were, that on the second occasion of our trying this dish, I cooked the two legs of lamb, weighing just about 12lbs, for 2.5 hours at 180C. Oven door opened several times - which must have reduced the effective time - and rested for 0.5 hours at 80C. So a good deal less than last time, but still cooked. I think next time around I shall try an even shorter time at a higher temperature. Although I dare say the experiment will be confused by dropping back from two legs to one.

Reminded on opening the oven door of the blast of heat you get from a hot oven. Without glasses on I dare say one could do serious damage. Do oven masters in commercial kitchens have to wear protective head gear?

We thought about cooking the two legs in a joined up fashion, as they had not been separated at the time of arrival at the butcher. But we decided that this would complicate carving without adding anything to the appearance of the thing. Entire sheep one thing, back end of sheep quite another. We also decided to remove the hip bones.

I noted with interest the suggestion from our esteemed secretary of state for Her Majesty's transport in yesterday's DT that the better off amongst us should leave our freedom passes at home and pay our bus fares like other folk, thus reducing the bill - more than £1b I think - for this concession. A suggestion which fell on deaf ears in my household. I have also been peddling my voluntary donation scheme of June 15 in various places, also on deaf ears. But all this reminded me of a scheme which I recall being told about in school 50 years ago, to the effect that rather than bothering to send a cheque to the Bank of England, addressed to the Consolidated Fund, you simply burn a bank note. I imagine, then as now, that the transaction charge associated with a cheque is more than the cost of printing the bank note, so burning, leaving aside any possible global warming consequences, is the better deal. As an experiment, I tried burning a bank note this morning. Didn't quite have the buzz that sending a cheque to the Bank of England (with the possibility of pompous reply on fancy notepaper) would have had, confirming the old wisdom that private charity is more virtuous than public charity.

I remain puzzled that the idea of voluntary donation falls on deaf ears, even among people fairly happy to pay their share. Or fairly happy to give substantial sums to charity. They don't mind suffering whatever the government thrusts upon them but they are jolly well not going to volunteer.

I close with my understanding of the cuts equation. Item 1, Great Britain as a whole is gobbling up a lot more than it is growing. The deficit being made up by selling off great chunks of said place. Item 2, the government part of Great Britain is spending (on us) a lot more than it is collecting in tax. The deficit is made up by borrowing, with the lenders (mostly overseas) getting a bit restive. Item 3, the distribution of wealth in Great Britain has become very unhealthy with a small number of people at the top of the heap having a great deal of money. Items 1 and 2 mean that we are in for a burst of austerity. A reduction in living standards, a reduction in wealth or both. Item 3 means that we should take some care to be fair about these reductions. People at the bottom of the heap need to see some pain at the top of the heap if they are to contribute without great squawkings and squeakings.

Monday, July 05, 2010

 

PS

Regarding the library coup, been puzzled by the classification scheme. All three books carry both a white label at the base of the spine and just above it a yellow label. The white label carrying what I correctly guessed to be the Dewey classification. So 942.09 for some sort of history, which was fair enough. The yellow label carrying a three letter abbreviation - so MUS for the music book and GRE for the other two. MUS fairly straightforward, but what about GRE?

First association was to the thing called greats by some universities. But Mr G. fairly quickly establishes that this is the name for classics - Latin and Greek - based degree courses. So that does not fit this bill.

I then ask Mr G. about library classification schemes. Where I learn that the Library of Congress has an alphabetic classification scheme - but not one that uses GRE for the two books in hand. That classification schemes are apt to reflect the preoccupations of their inventors. So some classification schemes go to great lengths to classify books about religion. Then there is something called the Bliss classification scheme, which appears to be alphabetic but not necessarily three letters - which I guess the Surrey libraries scheme to be. But I cannot find out to much about Bliss as, while being a not for profit gang, they are into selling the books containing the classification. Quite big books too by the look of their web site (http://www.blissclassification.org.uk/). And so not into posting their classification on the internet.

Along the way I learn that there are plenty of GRE acronyms. For example graduate record examination and genetic routing encapsulation. Not helpful.

So, on the basis of half an hour with Mr G., unable to find out what GRE might mean to a Surrey librarian. An interesting example of the limitations of the world wide web. It is of course possible that the answer is blindingly obvious to some or even most people. Always was a bit prone to blunders.

Sunday, July 04, 2010

 

Fish novel

Following a tip from Tooting, tried a new-to-us way of cooking the Friday cod. Cover bottom of fish kettle with thinly sliced onion. Place trivet on top. Add 2 litres of blue top milk, a knob of butter and some freshly grated nutmeg. Add fish. Cover, bring to boil and simmer for a further five minutes or so. Remove fish to warm oven. Roux a little corn flour in butter and then stir in a portion of the milk fish liquor to make a thinnish white sauce. Serve fish with sauce, mashed potato and finely slivered & boiled white cabbage. Not bad at all, sauce good. But not sure whether the game was worth the candle - a lot more bother than our usual baking. Might of been different, of course, had I used the haddock specified rather than cod, but the fish man from Hastings does not carry haddock very often.

Remains of the potato, cabbage and sauce fried up in a little more butter for tea. An excellent variation on the bubble and squeak theme.

Can also report on a further coup at the Bourne Hall library where I acquired an aristo. book by David Cannadine for 50p, a pleasure wars book by Peter Gay for 50p and a GCSE music revision guide from Longmans for 20p. The first two because I had heard of them, the last because I thought it might throw some light on scales, a subject I find intriguing but impenetrable. More than £50 worth of book for £1.20. The first two in good condition, only slightly used, the revision text much more battered. All three marred by the library habit of crudely ripping out the front page when they sell books. One would think that librarians, who ought to be book lovers, would show more respect. Why do they need to remove the page anyway? And if they really do have to remove it (which I find hard to credit), why can't they cut the page out neatly?

Did not, in the event, learn much about scales from the revision guide, but I did learn something about GCSE music, a subject considered hard in my day and not much taken, with the guide containing almost as much material about GCSE as about music. It seems that this GCSE has been made much more accessible, open to those of all ability and including both non European music (Islamic music is not singled out here, although it rates an article in Wikipedia) and popular music, while seemingly retaining a classical European core. In three roughly equal parts: listening to music, playing music and composing music. Still looked quite difficult to me - despite which, 20% of candidates get an A grade.

On the subject of Islamic music, I do not think that pupils should be allowed to mix and match their lessons. One lot objecting to music, another lot objecting to history and yet another lot to biology. All far too disruptive and expensive. Quite apart from it being a bad thing: children should get the benefit of a general education. So if you go to a state school, you can jolly well fit in with what the state sees fit to teach. Otherwise your parents are free to make their own arrangements.

I close with something I have learned about the word draconian. Which started off by my thinking, a propos of some bit of news or other, that it was odd describe spending cuts as draconian. Given that dragons are creatures of fantasy, not clear what their attitude to spending cuts would be. Or, indeed, to anything much else. So off to the OED where I find a wealth of draco flavoured words, some of them to do with dragons (I learn, for example, that a lady dragon is a dracaena and that a dracunculus is a muscular hair worm) but some of them to do with a chap called Draco, a fierce legislator operating in Athens six centuries before the birth of our lord. So our draconian is used both in the sense of dragon-like and that of Draco-like.

Friday, July 02, 2010

 

Its that broadband time again

My not having talked to BT since early May (see Friday May 7) was clearly getting to the broadband set up. By way of a change, it had not broken down, but was exhibiting irritating behaviour. That is to say, that an outgoing call on the telephone broke any broadband session. The broadband session would put itself back together again, a process which might take a couple of minutes and might upset whatever internet service one was talking to. I thought, without having bothered to keep appropriate records, that this irritating behaviour started about the same time as we acquired the new telephone handset.

Now given that this was not a big deal, rather a little deal, I thought I would email BT rather than phone them. It took me a while fighting through their (generally helpful) broadband help to find a click here to contact us by email button, but find one I did. Take a little trouble to set down the trouble and fire off the email. This being Monday. The BT help desk is on the case and phones me more or less immediately, although the operator rather gave the impression that he phoned first and read the email second. (Not that I can complain. I used to do the very same thing when I was in the world of work. Thought that I could divine what an email was about by looking at it rather than reading it. Sometimes with embarrassing results). In parallel, I get an email acknowledging the call. We go through the usual sort of stuff and decide that I will try changing the splitter (a small white box which plugs into the phone socket in the wall, a BT ADSL MF50. An item of which I have acquired 4 over the years) and that they will send me an email. I change the splitter and demonstrate to my satisfaction that it works, apart from the broadband connection being temporarily broken by an outbound telephone call. The email, apart from reproducing my original query and adding a bunch of call centre stuff, suggests that I try whatever is suggested at the 'slow broadband' part of the broadband help. Which does not strike me as relevant at all. I reply to the email and the operator rings me back.

After further palaver he says that he is going to get an engineer to come and sort me out, an engineer who will ring within 48 hours. Which indeed he does and he does indeed turn up on Thursday morning as agreed. He attaches his toys to my telephone and we establish that outgoing calls are indeed a problem. But, he is no more convinced than the help desk operator that the problem is anything to do with the new telephone. Dodgy splitter he says. Let's try mine. His works. We end up with him installing a new style splitter which, rather than hanging off the socket, is actually screwed into it. This seems to work fine and I can now blog while the BH natters.

Two of the four splitters are now in the dustbin. I keep the other two just in case. The engineer keeps the original top plate to the telephone socket. Perhaps I should have tried all four splitters at the point I was trying two of them. That aside, the engineer explained that the new style splitter was a more robust affair than the old style one and was unlikely to cause a problem. I should never be seeing him again.

So, leaving aside the fact that there was this irritation in the first place, I think the BT response was all that could reasonably be expected. 10 out of 10.

Thursday, July 01, 2010

 

Trying day

Something has either happened to my taste buds or to the blue cap whole milk from Mr. S.. Tea in bed tasted bad this morning. I accused the BH of having used soya milk instead of blue cap; horror of horrors. A crime which she denied. Then, this evening, I make my own tea with a newly thawed one pint plastic bottle of blue cap and it tastes just the same. I notice that this newly thawed bottle claims to be less than 4% fat - as if this was something to be proud of. Having taken on some cargo, I am not sure that the last bottle didn't say 5%. But then, why should it matter? Tea is made up of hot water plus chemicals dissolved out of tea bags. If I then add milk which is cold water plus some other chemicals, why should it matter what the concentration of those chemicals is? I can always add a bit more. OK, so the brew gets a bit colder, but that should only mean that one gets at the cuppa a bit faster than one might otherwise.

But the fact remains that the cuppa in the hand reminds me of the cuppa fortified with green cap milk - less than 2% active ingredients. And it does not taste too good at all. A fact that can probably be denied by infusion of SC & lemonade.

Before the tea problem kicked in, I had been paying a visit to Garrett Lane. Where I find that the first segment heading east from Earlsfield station is fairly healthy, but that the second segment is not. Lots of shops and restaurants to let, not least the establishment called 'Kazans' which we had happily visited on at least two occasions in the last year or so. Maybe we are in a period of transition where the older shops, doing things like selling beef on the bone, paint and nails, die out while the newer shops catering to the tastes of the bright young things of whom Earlsfield seems to be full are sprouting up and taking their chance in the commercial jungle. But there is a bit of friction here. Some of the shops get to be empty some of the time while this all sorts itself out.

Further east still, I came across a screw shop, the owner of which had decided that old-speak screws which tapered were out and that new-speak screws which did not taper and which could be driven into softwood without having to bother to drill a hole, were in. As a result of which I acquire 200 steel countersunk 1.5 inch No. 6 for £1 and 200 steel countersunk 2.0 inch No. 10 for £2. OK so they are not proper GKN screws, but at least they are steel coloured. Not those silvery, aluminium coloured jobs you get in car booters. On reflection, I should have taken some 1.0 inch screws - a size of which I use quite a lot of and the last consignment of which seem to have some kind of star head for which I do not have a screwdriver. Not a very good bargain at all.

Plus, I am not at all sure about these thin self tapping screws. They give quite a good fix in the vertical direction but I am not at all sure about lateral thrust. I think that one of these thin screws is going to wobble in the hole in a way that a fat screw would not. Just think of the short fat screws traditionally used to fix doors to door frames.

Having got a screw result, adjourned to the Polish grocery where, inter alia, they sold a lot of loose sausage, including kabanos which they assured did not include cheese, unlike some of the kabanos sold by Waitrose. They turned out to be very dry, tasting of fish somehow. Rather good, so I shall go there again.

The visit closed with re-entry to the suburban world at Earlsfield Station. Now it might be true, as observed on 29 June, that one can have a fag on the platform without being troubled. But you certainly could not walk past the station today with anything more noxious in your pockets as there was a considerable police presence there, complete with two sniffer dogs, a presence which was present, to my knowledge, for at least three hours. At least the two dog handlers had bothered to put a uniform of sorts on. Sadly, the two chaps whom they had seen fit to stop were rather sullen looking young black men. Well, OK, maybe they are more likely to be carrying said noxious substances, but it does not create a very good impression. When are we going to see the light? I am told the Portuguese have and I shall have to find out how they are getting on.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?