Sunday, March 13, 2011
Compost
Today was the second part of the biennial clearing of the compost bin. Probably at least one part to go.Compost dark brown, fairly damp, quite a few worms and a faint smell of animal glue. Or rendering plant.
Removed from bin and then sieved to produce something not too far away from what we might otherwise buy from the garden centre, at least in appearance. Filled up the various buckets and garden containers to hand which now await distribution by BH. In the garage for safekeeping in the meantime.
The sieve caught one dessert spoon which had probably been there for a couple of years, but being stainless steel none the worse for wear. BH now into sterilisation cycle just to be on the safe side. A lot of bones. Quite a few beef ribs, miscellaneous bits of sheep and pig and one turkey breast bone. Oddly, given that we consume a fair amount of the stuff, no oxtail bones. The sieve catchings were scattered on the landfill site a few yards away from the compost bin.
I thought to mark the occasion by placing one of my concrete art works (illustrated) at the right angle of the 3-4-5 triangle formed with the hypotenuse running from the compost bin to the landfill site. Compost bin at the 3-5 angle, landfill site at the 4-5 angle. Hopefully, in years to come, some bearded television archaeologists will puzzle noisily over this cult site. Perhaps an underground cult of meat eaters formed around the time that the EU banned meat consumption in the wake of the considerable societal dislocation caused by global warming? Why else would there be these carefully placed artefacts in an area otherwise devoid of animal remains? On the perimeter of what had clearly been a circle of small beech trees, well known for their cultic associations in this part of western Europe. Was the concrete art work really a sacrificial stone, or perhaps something on which to joint the furtively barbecued meat? Was it all a throw back to a Pythagorean cult?
With apologies to Hašek who had the idea first.
Monday, July 20, 2009
Second lift
Now completed the second lift of the concrete buttress for the compost bin at the bottom of the garden, having decided not to implant a garden gnome by way of a gargoyle. He or she might have got in the way of composting operations. Will leave the shutter on for a bit, after which we will see how the join between first and second lift looks.
But eco-budget not looking so good. I have now spent about £15 on materials to build this buttress, which will prolong the life of the compost bin for some years, which sum perhaps converts into £7.50 petrol's worth. Now today's average price over the 109 petrol stations within 10 miles of the compost bin is 103.3p per litre (see http://www.petrolprices.com). Which means that I have spent 7.26 litres of petrol on this aid for home conservation. Now, as I understand things, the garden and kitchen waste which goes into the compost bin is partially consumed by a variety of macro and microscopic animals, converting quite a lot of it back from carbohydrates, fats and proteins into carbon dioxide and water. So my contribution to the carbon situation so far negative. What is left goes on the garden. No idea how much of what is left is just inert humus - what they call fibre at Kellogs - and how much is actually plant food. Not at all clear that the eco-benefit of all this humus is going to amount to all those litres of petrol. But good fun making it.
Had we gone for the other option and had the large lorry from the council collect the stuff, would they have done any better? Would they have extracted all the energy from said waste (perhaps using the contraption from the film in which they made soylent green out of corpses. A subject on which Mr G. is positively fulsome) and fed it into the national grid? Would that have shown a profit after paying for the large lorry and paying all the people to sit in it? I shall keep an eye on the Guardian eco-section just in case the eco-warriers change gear and decide that making compost at home is indeed bad for the planet.
Apart from that, I have been puzzling about the relationship between the words idle and idol. At first blush, one might have thought there was one. However, close inspection of the OED reveals that idle is an old German word, or to be particular, old Frisian, amongst others. Started off by meaning empty. Then empty thoughts, that is to say idle thoughts. Then onto idle machinery and people. So a machine could be said to be idling without being rude about it. A neutral statement. But then the term acquired a generally critical tone. Idle was bad. Idol, on the other hand, seems to be an old French word from the Greek via late Latin. Started off by meaning the phantom or insubstantial. An image in water or a mirror. A mental image or fancy and then onto a material image or fancy. Which sense was then appropriated by the Jews and Christians to describe objects of worship for pagans. Brass Apollos and golden calves. As with idle, a word which started off morally fairly nuetral, became highly charged. Idol was very bad.
But I still hanker after a connection. OED might say one comes from up north and the other comes from down south, but the starting point of both is more or less 'empty'. Is there a common Aryan root unknown to the compilers of the OED all those years ago?
I feel I should close with an honourable mention for http://venusreinvented.blogspot.com/. Someone who is clearly very keen on libraries. Libraries of all sorts: domestic, collector, local, regional and national. I already know something about libararies in the UK, using their generally excellent Internet connectivity. But maybe I should take a leaf out of her book and start visiting libraries as I travel around, rather as I presently visit churches. I can already claim visits to the Bibliotheque Nationale and to various civil service libaries (these days sadly diminished by loss of their floor space to people and their books to auction houses); maybe it is time I checked off the British Library.
Saturday, October 09, 2010
Curved air
Interested to read over the breakfast sardine sarnies of a group called 'Curved Air', quite big in the 70's - when one might have thought I might of heard of them - but hadn't - and who are performing shortly in Sutton with 4 of the original line-up, including the lady lead singer. Intrigued that a serious group from that era was still up and running, trolled off to Wikipedia which tells me that there was a bit of the gap through most of the 80's and 90's, but that the group have now been reformed. Look like an interesting bunch with a fair bit of classical training in their background, including places like the Yehudi Menuhin School, not that far from us in Epsom. But why do they keep going? Are they any good? Do they have devoted groupies of retiring age who trundle after them? Would they have been anything like 'Jethro Tull'? Even went so far as to investigate buying tickets - but then worked out that actually we shall be at the Wigmore Hall on the day in question. Might otherwise have been my first concert of popular music at least two decades.
After that moved into a bit of computing DIY, moving one of our PCs from Vista to Windows 7, a move precipitated by a desire to try out the new version of MS Office. Off to our small Staples where a helpful chap with title 'General Manager' made sure that I knew the difference between an upgrade and a clean install and gave me a quick tutorial on the pros and cons of going to 64 bit, which I think is an option on the PC in question. Despite my being a fairly heavy Excel user, he persuaded me that it was not worth the bother just yet. Reasonable risk that I would hit problems which would cost me money - in the form of a support engineer - to fix. Maybe in years to come when it has matured a bit or if one has an IT department to bail one out of trouble. Box now sitting on desk waiting for action. Shall I buy a few shares in Microsoft to make me feel better? Their site says they come at about $25 a pop so it will really have to be just a few.
Then after a short break for a cup that cheered, onto woodworking DIY. Time for a new lid to the compost bin or we might be having some rats take up permanent residence. The current one was made out of the door - tongue and groove affair - which came with our shed twenty years ago but has sagged badly following reinforcement last year. Start off with a sheet of WBP plywood from our helpful Travis Perkins at Blenheim Road. Said to be weather and boil proof whatever that might mean. £25 which seemed enough for a compost bin lid. Wasn't going to go as far as marine ply. Turns out to be a middle grade ply which looks to have been made of some sort of rain forest, rather than the birch ply I grew up with. Reasonable number of voids visible on the sawn edges. Cut to size. Attach a length of three by two along the long way to stop the thing sagging. Re-purpose a massive steel handle - heavy thing, maybe eight inches long. Re-purpose some mahogany from North London. Attach the handle to the leading edge of the lid with a mahogany sandwich and a couple of coach bolts. Didn't think that attaching the handle direct to the ply would last very long. And I have always rather liked the massive approach to fittings.
But what about paint? The stuff might be water proof and boil proof, but might it not be an idea to put some gloss on a lid which is going to spend its life horizontal, collecting water? Despite the drain holes that I will put in tomorrow. Settled for painting just the top and edges, and will leave the underside to the slugs. So now spent another few pounds worth on Dulux Weathershield Undercoat. Good stuff though. Will spend another few pounds worth on Dulux Weathershield Gloss (white). Total cost, not counting recycled material and my time, maybe as much as £40. How much would have it cost me to get someone else to do it? Then how much more to do it to my specification and under my supervision? Would certainly have taken a lot longer.
And then one ought to take the ecological temperature of this operation. Nice new lid will keep the heat in and this will mean that the compost will rot down good and fast. Plenty of oxygen sucked out of the atmosphere, plenty of carbon dioxide and heat pumped back in. New lid made out of tropical rain forest and glue. Glue and paint probably made out of oil. Upside, modest amount of crumbly brown compost to spread around the roses. Maybe the planet would have done better had I entrusted all the food and veg. which went into it to our local council for them to recycle properly?
Compost must be fairly warm already. Spread some grass clippings - which generate heat at a good clip - on it yesterday with the result that the bin was warm enough that a number of red worms had to come up for air. Alternatively they are breeding so fast that the bin is getting crowded and lesser mortals have to take their chances on the surface. A surface which might, just for the moment, involve rats. At least, at night. Non residents.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Hygiene
Bath smelt of swimming pools this morning. Must be one of those times when the water people shove a dose of chlorine through the (drinking) water to clear out a few bugs. Maybe they had a dirty leak somewhere.
While down the garden we have vermin. Readers may recall that the compost heap at the bottom of the garden has a lid on it. Not something we ever bothered with in Cambridge where the garden might almost have been in the country but we never had foxes digging into the compost, so there was no need to cover it with anything more grand than a bit of old carpet to stop the dry stuff at the top blowing about. Here in the suburbs however we have lots of foxes, not yet seen off by the shiny new beagle puppy next door.
And I like to put all our food waste on the compost on the grounds that one gets better compost that way. With the catch being that foxes like items like beef ribs, which they dig up, scattering bits and pieces far and wide in the process. So BH said no. It has to stop. So I put a lid on the compost heap, a lid which was last refurbished October 14th or so, 2010. And the lid did indeed keep the foxes out but it also created a haven for rats. It proved impossible to make the compost bin rat proof, so being fox proof, relatively warm, and full of food, from time to time one got rats. The evidence was mainly in the form of all the minced compost thrown onto the top of the heap from their tunnellings.
Last time this happened I got some rat poison, stuff that came in blue pellets and put it in a tray on the top of the compost. After a while we had one dead rat and no live rats. Problem went away for a bit. But I did get ticked off for using rat poison in the vicinity of cats, even though the cats could not get directly at the stuff.
And now we have rat or rats again. Much evidence of tunnelling and one morning there was even a sighting. First line of attack was to disrupt the tunnels by poking them out with a suitable pole, and quite big some of them seemed to be too. The thought was that rats are relatively clever animals and if I kept smashing up their tunnels, they would move on. But no luck. They seemed to keep going. Furthermore, they were probably eating all the red worms which make the compost tick, indeed, that might have been what they were tunnelling for.
Then I had another brain wave. Given that we are probably going to have foxes anyway, compost for them to poke around in or not, why not just take the lid off. The compost is quite soft and the foxes might dig the rats out in short order. And if not the foxes maybe the cats, cats not being too hot at digging but pretty good at sitting and waiting. So that is where the matter rests at the moment. Lid off.
I am also conscious that the council are now collecting food waste from the little green plastic buckets (with fox & rat secure lids) with which they have supplied us, although I have so far declined to play. But given that they are going to collect whether I play or not and that I understand that the food waste is put into some huge fermenter out of which they get some useful energy, rather than just blowing it into the air in the way of a compost heap, I suspect that it would actually be more eco overall if I were to play. This suspicion has yet to be translated into action but that day may soon dawn.
While down the garden we have vermin. Readers may recall that the compost heap at the bottom of the garden has a lid on it. Not something we ever bothered with in Cambridge where the garden might almost have been in the country but we never had foxes digging into the compost, so there was no need to cover it with anything more grand than a bit of old carpet to stop the dry stuff at the top blowing about. Here in the suburbs however we have lots of foxes, not yet seen off by the shiny new beagle puppy next door.
And I like to put all our food waste on the compost on the grounds that one gets better compost that way. With the catch being that foxes like items like beef ribs, which they dig up, scattering bits and pieces far and wide in the process. So BH said no. It has to stop. So I put a lid on the compost heap, a lid which was last refurbished October 14th or so, 2010. And the lid did indeed keep the foxes out but it also created a haven for rats. It proved impossible to make the compost bin rat proof, so being fox proof, relatively warm, and full of food, from time to time one got rats. The evidence was mainly in the form of all the minced compost thrown onto the top of the heap from their tunnellings.
Last time this happened I got some rat poison, stuff that came in blue pellets and put it in a tray on the top of the compost. After a while we had one dead rat and no live rats. Problem went away for a bit. But I did get ticked off for using rat poison in the vicinity of cats, even though the cats could not get directly at the stuff.
And now we have rat or rats again. Much evidence of tunnelling and one morning there was even a sighting. First line of attack was to disrupt the tunnels by poking them out with a suitable pole, and quite big some of them seemed to be too. The thought was that rats are relatively clever animals and if I kept smashing up their tunnels, they would move on. But no luck. They seemed to keep going. Furthermore, they were probably eating all the red worms which make the compost tick, indeed, that might have been what they were tunnelling for.
Then I had another brain wave. Given that we are probably going to have foxes anyway, compost for them to poke around in or not, why not just take the lid off. The compost is quite soft and the foxes might dig the rats out in short order. And if not the foxes maybe the cats, cats not being too hot at digging but pretty good at sitting and waiting. So that is where the matter rests at the moment. Lid off.
I am also conscious that the council are now collecting food waste from the little green plastic buckets (with fox & rat secure lids) with which they have supplied us, although I have so far declined to play. But given that they are going to collect whether I play or not and that I understand that the food waste is put into some huge fermenter out of which they get some useful energy, rather than just blowing it into the air in the way of a compost heap, I suspect that it would actually be more eco overall if I were to play. This suspicion has yet to be translated into action but that day may soon dawn.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Hands up
Finished phase 1a of pond refurbishment today, just before hands gave out. Dug out about six barrow loads of yellow clay flavoured with black gunk from the bottom of the old pond. Sticky gear which I had to cut off the fork, making it a slow job. I can see how it might have been made into bricks down the road, down Kiln Road in fact, presently the site for our local Mr S.. Easily lost the six barrow loads on top of the chippings from the willow tree that was chopped down next door last year. It will be interesting to see how long it takes for lumps (say irregular five inch cubes) of yellow clay to start to break down and harbour some plant life. Not visible from house and not obtrusive from the path to the compost bin at the bottom of the garden, so not a problem.
During this proceeding, three newts made into the new tubs. Not sure where they came from or whether getting into the tubs was really a very bright idea. Fished one out. Sat on the edge a bit comatose for a bit, then got lost in the rocks somewhere. Then what looked like the pupae of some large fly or beetle made it to the bottom of a tub. No idea how it got there. Dropped by a bird? And last but not least a frog, liberally painted with liquid yellow clay, hopped across the clay and hunkered down under the rim of the centre tub. Maybe he will survive if the warm weather continues.
Planted tasteful line of limestone rocks along the northern perimeter of the new pond area, separating it from the existing beds containing heather, ornamental grasses and bulbs. Then dug out the front of the compost bin and used the resulting four barrowloads of well rotted, dark brown compost to cover the yellow clay, bringing the compost to the edge of the old pond area. Should look well when FIL has planted it up. Now we leave it for a few weeks to see how much it sinks. If necessary, get a bit of topsoil from a garden centre to top it up. The idea is that the soil comes up to just underneath the rims of the three tubs, but not to re-use the stones which used to encircle the old pond. Apart from the bother, I think it would look a bit fussy around three black tubs. But we will see. There may, it is just possible, be other views.
Franklin had a good nose around the new tubs. Let's hope he doesn't fall in one dark night. He would probably be able to get out but he might be a bit cold until next door woke up and let him in to dry out.
We learn on the way that pyramidal white candles do not rot down. Some signs of rodent gnawing but none of rotting. Chopped the thing up and chucked it back into the compost for a second go.
And we learn from the DT that the late partner of a leading Blair Babe has been caught with his nose in the trough and has been sentenced to a spell in an Italian jail. A spell, it seems, he will be able to wriggle out of. The Italians must be really chuffed to have a close relative of the BBB (Blair-Brown bunch. Vide supra) on the block, having had it up to their oxters with the BBB droning on and on at international gatherings about how good law and order is in the good old UK and how awful it is in wopland. Nice to have the boot on the other foot for once.
Also that good old Stella R, late custodian of a very private part of government, no doubt with a very fat pension, continues to bang on. And of all people, she, according to the DT, is warning the great British public that their establishment is turning the country into a police state. She might be right, but a bit rum coming from her. I would be a bit cheesed off if I was the Home Secretary. On the other hand, a bit of fresh air in private parts of government might be no bad thing, and who better than the former custodian to knock a few holes in the levee (aka dyke)?
But the most interesting snippet from yesterday was from the rather engaging autobiography of a Duke of Bedford, snapped up in a charity shop somewhere. Apart from the standard of care in his family when he was a child being well up to today's standard of child abuse, well worth a visit from the social services, I learn that an ancestor of his pioneered the cultivation of colza, in or around the New Bedford river. This, as is well known, being a relative of the cauliflower, the seeds of which were pressed to yeild a popular lamp oil in the 17th century. No doubt, one of the foundations of the family fortune. And the word might come in very handy in Scrabble. Wow the inmates of your local day centre with it on the triple word!
During this proceeding, three newts made into the new tubs. Not sure where they came from or whether getting into the tubs was really a very bright idea. Fished one out. Sat on the edge a bit comatose for a bit, then got lost in the rocks somewhere. Then what looked like the pupae of some large fly or beetle made it to the bottom of a tub. No idea how it got there. Dropped by a bird? And last but not least a frog, liberally painted with liquid yellow clay, hopped across the clay and hunkered down under the rim of the centre tub. Maybe he will survive if the warm weather continues.
Planted tasteful line of limestone rocks along the northern perimeter of the new pond area, separating it from the existing beds containing heather, ornamental grasses and bulbs. Then dug out the front of the compost bin and used the resulting four barrowloads of well rotted, dark brown compost to cover the yellow clay, bringing the compost to the edge of the old pond area. Should look well when FIL has planted it up. Now we leave it for a few weeks to see how much it sinks. If necessary, get a bit of topsoil from a garden centre to top it up. The idea is that the soil comes up to just underneath the rims of the three tubs, but not to re-use the stones which used to encircle the old pond. Apart from the bother, I think it would look a bit fussy around three black tubs. But we will see. There may, it is just possible, be other views.
Franklin had a good nose around the new tubs. Let's hope he doesn't fall in one dark night. He would probably be able to get out but he might be a bit cold until next door woke up and let him in to dry out.
We learn on the way that pyramidal white candles do not rot down. Some signs of rodent gnawing but none of rotting. Chopped the thing up and chucked it back into the compost for a second go.
And we learn from the DT that the late partner of a leading Blair Babe has been caught with his nose in the trough and has been sentenced to a spell in an Italian jail. A spell, it seems, he will be able to wriggle out of. The Italians must be really chuffed to have a close relative of the BBB (Blair-Brown bunch. Vide supra) on the block, having had it up to their oxters with the BBB droning on and on at international gatherings about how good law and order is in the good old UK and how awful it is in wopland. Nice to have the boot on the other foot for once.
Also that good old Stella R, late custodian of a very private part of government, no doubt with a very fat pension, continues to bang on. And of all people, she, according to the DT, is warning the great British public that their establishment is turning the country into a police state. She might be right, but a bit rum coming from her. I would be a bit cheesed off if I was the Home Secretary. On the other hand, a bit of fresh air in private parts of government might be no bad thing, and who better than the former custodian to knock a few holes in the levee (aka dyke)?
But the most interesting snippet from yesterday was from the rather engaging autobiography of a Duke of Bedford, snapped up in a charity shop somewhere. Apart from the standard of care in his family when he was a child being well up to today's standard of child abuse, well worth a visit from the social services, I learn that an ancestor of his pioneered the cultivation of colza, in or around the New Bedford river. This, as is well known, being a relative of the cauliflower, the seeds of which were pressed to yeild a popular lamp oil in the 17th century. No doubt, one of the foundations of the family fortune. And the word might come in very handy in Scrabble. Wow the inmates of your local day centre with it on the triple word!
Monday, November 03, 2008
Heritage folk
Must write to the National Trust about the disgraceful state of the exceptional signal box at Dawlish Warren railway station. Shut up, as far as one can see, just rotting away, propped up by two props the terminal concrete blocks of which take up about three car spaces in the not very large car park. Given that the signal box may date all the way back to that illustrious engineer Brunel, I think someone should do something about it. Another peice of national treasure in danger of sliding down the pan.
Must also write to Mr Google about the dreadful state of his clocks (maybe also mentioning the fact that Exeter Library does not seem to care for some of his security certificates. Rejects them a fair proportion of the time). The time stamps on my posts give the unfortunate impression that I blog in the small hours of the morning - which I presume to be the time in the Mountain View (a guess. But I have a soft spot for the name having once met a Finn who was going there) bunker which houses the relevant server farm. I wonder if they do tours of what must be a very impressive bit of kit. I think the Amazon do tours of their very impressive warehouse, somewhere in the South of England, provided you can drum up some interest beyond the casual and don't try around Christmas when they have a lock down or something. So maybe Google with their very public service ethos do something of the sort too.
Yesterday I became more closely acquainted with the workings of plastic bell compost makers - the big black plastic things, roughly the shape of a bell, but with a lid on the top and sometimes with a hatch at the bottom. I dare say one can get them from the council these days. Getting more closely acquainted involved emptying two of them and digging the compost into FIL's potato patch - this year's that is, not next year's. The compost had been made from a mixture of garden and kitchen waste, was very dry (despite there being a reasonable supply of the little red worms which do the business) and was not as good as the stuff I get out of our rather larger brick compost bin. So the considered view is: whereas 1) despite being four feet or so high and taking up a lot of space, they do not hold a great deal; 2) they are reasonable awkward to load and empty; and, 3) they do keep the rats and mice out, I conclude that they are not as good a deal as the brick compost bin. I can live with putting out the traps.
Must also write to Mr Google about the dreadful state of his clocks (maybe also mentioning the fact that Exeter Library does not seem to care for some of his security certificates. Rejects them a fair proportion of the time). The time stamps on my posts give the unfortunate impression that I blog in the small hours of the morning - which I presume to be the time in the Mountain View (a guess. But I have a soft spot for the name having once met a Finn who was going there) bunker which houses the relevant server farm. I wonder if they do tours of what must be a very impressive bit of kit. I think the Amazon do tours of their very impressive warehouse, somewhere in the South of England, provided you can drum up some interest beyond the casual and don't try around Christmas when they have a lock down or something. So maybe Google with their very public service ethos do something of the sort too.
Yesterday I became more closely acquainted with the workings of plastic bell compost makers - the big black plastic things, roughly the shape of a bell, but with a lid on the top and sometimes with a hatch at the bottom. I dare say one can get them from the council these days. Getting more closely acquainted involved emptying two of them and digging the compost into FIL's potato patch - this year's that is, not next year's. The compost had been made from a mixture of garden and kitchen waste, was very dry (despite there being a reasonable supply of the little red worms which do the business) and was not as good as the stuff I get out of our rather larger brick compost bin. So the considered view is: whereas 1) despite being four feet or so high and taking up a lot of space, they do not hold a great deal; 2) they are reasonable awkward to load and empty; and, 3) they do keep the rats and mice out, I conclude that they are not as good a deal as the brick compost bin. I can live with putting out the traps.
Monday, October 18, 2010
Compost bin lid
Underside of the compost bin lid very damp yesterday morning and not a worm in sight on the compost. Is the dampness due to the better fitting lid keeping all the heat and steam in? Or is it due to the underside being untreated and hairy rather than smooth? Why have the worms gone back down under?
To take our minds off these knotty problems, BH suggested a swing through Mickelham, a village in the Mole Gap. Contains, amongst other things, a gastro pub called the Running Horse, a private school related to Gordonstoun and the benefits from which are to be had from £25,000 a year per pupil. You would have to be earning a lot more than I ever managed to extract from HMG to be able to afford this, even supposing one thought mixing one's sprogs in with the wannabee toffs rather than getting on with regular, lager drinking folk was a good plan. Perhaps Cameron should claw back a little extra by stripping the charitable status from these places.
There was also an unusual church, so unusual that Pevsner (or at least one of his young collaborators) was moved to some dry wit on its account. He even talked of the chancel arch being duffed up. Perhaps this is the sort of slang one acquires at the school. We were told that there had been a church to St Michael and all the angels (Michelangelo in Italian?) since Saxon times and that chunks of the present fabric were late Norman. Neither the Saxons nor the Normans seem to have thought it worth their while to plant a castle there to guard the gap against aliens marching up from Sussex, although the Normans did get around to planting one at Betchworth around, the corner to the south east. There is, I think, the odd pill box in the vicinity but those, of course, were rather later.
What was unusual, for me anyway, was the Norman, Romanesque or Byzantine style of the extravagant renovations in the 19th century. Usually such things are done in the Decorated style, and while Norman & etc is common enough in the low church prayer booths in towns which were built in considerable numbers at about that time, I have never come across it in the country. All in all, as they say about the amber nectar, an amusing little church.
Three more oddities in the outer regions. First, it seems that if you are a viscount either you come big or you just rate a bigger gravestone. The viscount's stone here must have been about ten feet long and three feet wide. Didn't say anything about burying his horse, dogs and family with him. Second, despite it being rather a dinky part of Surrey, some of those buried here could not afford grave stones and had to settle for grave boards. Maybe four feet long by one foot deep and mounted along the middle of the grave. Name and details painted on the board by the local sign writer. But not sure that I approve of renovating such things. They should be allowed to moulder away undisturbed along with the remains of the person concerned. From that point of view, wooden board much more sensible than a stone board. Third, somewhere at the chancel end, was a bit of wall built in a chequerboard pattern with one foot alternating squares of dressed black flint and white clunch. A rather grander version of what can be seen in the garden walls at either or both of Hampton Court Palace and Nonsuch Park Mansion. Must go and check.
After the church, a stroll in the woods behind, mainly beech. Which appear to have naturally regenerated after some fairly drastic clearance event about 30 years ago. Maybe a hurricane. Which gave the wood a flavour quite unlike that of undisturbed mature woods - but a flavour which did not seem to include any birds.
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Litter bore
Yesterday to Epsom Common, late afternoon when it was nothing like the 30 degrees threatened by the man in the box. Passed the small pond where there was a good deal of fishing going on, plenty of buzzer and other boys. For once, someone actually caught quite a large fish as we were passing, a bream maybe a foot or more long. Didn't struggle much but I do not suppose being a fish in the bright sun is all that much fun; rather put me off the whole business. OK to do it to eat but not for fun. Suitably solemnised, then observed the large amount of litter around the fishing area, which might or might not be moved when the boys move. (There was the odd girl but only in accompaniment mode. No fishing girls). So, observing a large, reasonably clean bread bag, decided to become a litter bore for the afternoon. Bag about half full by the time we left the common, having seen one heron and one deer on the large pond. Thought about arranging the litter when we got home, a la enim, and photographing it for the blog but decided not to. Thought about writing an essay about the various detritus that one finds in this way, declaiming ponderously therein on the waste of the world, but decided not to do that either. Between the common and home found more litter than we had found on the common, but this including an empty compost bag from a garden centre, so I did not run out of space. The worst stretch, as one might expect, was around Stamford Green School. But this did include at least one house which had given up clearing it's front verge every morning, which is I think what we would do if we lived nearer the school. Got to set a standard. Got to do it visibly so that the little darlings gradually get the idea that littering the streets is not cool. Full compost bad ended up in our green dustbin. Thorough hand washing, the thoughts of Weil's disease having sprung to life. (Took me a little while to extract the name out of Mr. G., having thought that it was spelt Vial's disease. But I did learn that the posh name was leptospirosis).
The green dustbin has been recently supplemented by a black dustbin and a small green dustbin. The former, is I think, for various containers, not tins or glass which are catered for by a blue box, supplied earlier. The small green dustbin is for food waste and which we do not use as we have a compost bin. The small green dustbin accompanied by a very small grey dustbin intended as a kitchen residing food waste transfer facility. As we use a bucket under the sink for this purpose, following the natal tradition of Cambridge, the very small grey dustbin is now used as a medicine chest upstairs. We also have a reasonably complicated book of instructions which I suspect many of our otherwise respectable neighbours have not bothered to read, at least to judge by their lack of success in getting the right bin on the right pavement on the right day. All good stuff. Perhaps FIL will sign up for bin watch, this being the about to be announced big brother to neighbourhood watch. Perhaps I should write to the chief nanny about this one in case she overlooks the possibilities.
Interested to see that the DT is showing signs of moving off MP's expenses onto grossly overpaid public servants, starting with the well oiled fat cats from the BBC. I guess that in these recessionary times, people are going to be a lot more sensitive to the fact that the gap between the rich and the poor has become very large. Far larger than is healthy to my mind. Bound to lead to resentment and trouble of one kind or another. Maybe we will even have a proper debate about why someone with the bad luck to be born stupid on a bog standard housing association facility should get paid one hundredth of that which someone with the good luck to be born with acquisitive skills in a leafy suburb gets paid. One might make an argument about how the acquisitive people need to be motivated and that money is the easiest way to do this. One might talk about huge salaries being market driven and that market forces have to be left to do their thing, whatever that might be. But I am not convinced. I think the United Kingdom would be a happier and better place if we dragged these huge differentials down a bit. Started to break up the cosy circle of acquisitive people agreeing amongst themselves to pay themselves these huge salaries. Not to mention the pensions and the expenses.
Then I wonder what Mr Al-Fayed's expense account looks like. Presumably there is one somewhere. Maybe one of his assistants just draws down large amounts of cash every day and does it like that. No detailed paperwork to embarass him with tales of golden antelopes doing service as bath taps. A differance in his case being that he is a successful business man. What he chooses to do with his money is his business. But a CEO with shareholders to answer to is not quite the same. What about a CEO who also happens to own 51% of the shares? Are there rules about the extent that he can ride roughshod over the interests of the 49%. A quest for another day.
Sunday, March 30, 2008
The two sees
In this case computers and capitalism. Generally thought to be a good thing but the combination of which can sometimes have unfortunate consequences. The beef this morning being the elaborate fare structures that some industries go in for - my electicity utility and mobile phones being the two in mind. On Saturday I got a letter from EDF offering me a fixed price tariff for next year - which appeared to be some 15% more than the current tariff. But the whole thing came with an elaborate package of premium rates, seasonal rates and nectar points, the overall effect of which was that I couldn't be bothered to wade through it all. Not too mention elaborate provision for notification of tariff changes and cancellation of contract being explained in small print somewhere. Now in the days before computers, a utility could not bother with all this stuff. Its antiquated billing systems would collapse under the weight of tariffs.
So bring back the days when there was just one electricity company which was, no doubt, a bit dossy, but it had one rate for selling electricity and which one could trust not to rip one off too much. At least not by making large profits or paying their senior managers a lot more than I ever got paid. And even if they did make a large profit they were a nationalised industry so that was just a form of tax and so that was OK too.
But a mild counter stroke comes to mind, in the form of a short piece, I think from the Evening Standard, from the days when there was an Evening Standard and an Evening News, about how the divisional directors of London Buses did themselves OK, in a very discrete way, with elaborate panelled dining rooms and chauffer driven rollers. I guess this is all swept away now in the days of SouthWest trains the bosses of which no doubt go in for buying small Carribean Islands and hob-nobbing with P&B's. Maybe a bit of discrete self-indulgence was the lesser sin. I suppose the rich have a bit of a quandary here. A main point of being rich is to be richer than the next chap. And this does not have nearly so much savour if you don't know that the next chap knows it. But this also excites envy which might have untoward consequences. So do you enjoy your riches in private and bask in the dim glow of public approval or do you go for celeb-ration?
Yesterday, force majeure, we went in for a slighly novel recipe for the sage and onion stuffing with which to stuff our virgin reared organic vegetarian chicken from darkest Wales. Possibly from a subsidiary of the Duchy Grocers, definately via Cheam. The problem being that we had no sage - at least no more than a teaspoon of dried and no fresh - and no hazel nuts. We were reduced to using dried marjoram (which did not seem to smell of anything much at all) and Brazil nuts. Quite eatable but not, I think, quite up to snuff. Chicken went down OK though and the bones having been boiled for soup are now en-route to the compost bin. This last being a two stage process: into the bucket under the sink. From there to the dustbin on the patio. From there to the compost bin. The trick being to remember to empty the dustbin before it gets too heavy.
Yesterday our back lawn was more or less water-logged, although short of standing water. Very squishy to walk on, as I discovered when I went looking for the aforementioned sage. So this morning, when I finally have a slot to get back onto the allotment, is the ground going to be good for anything? Still, at the very least, I can take the cabbage cages to peices.
And I am now ready for the slugs. Decided not to spend £50 with Geo. Kelly on copper strips, rather to recycle the reel of 5 amp cable that had found its way into my garage roof. Maybe 50 meters of the stuff. I discovered that you could rip the white outer cover off: a good pull and one did about 60cm. Given that I had taken on some alcohol during the day, quite sweaty by the time I finished this first phase. Then left with a red plastic strand, a black plastic strand and a copper. Neither red plastic nor black plastic seemed to rip off so I had to take it of with a knife. Slightly faster - per strand - than the white stuff. Peel off a segment of the red (or black) cover, rather like peeling a potato, and the cover pulls off as easy as pie. Maybe 120cm at a time. All done by 2000.
I think I shall use the cable twisted into three, as it has been put back on the reel. Then make the twists up into L-shaped lengths. Maybe a metre long with 10cm returns. These can then be assembled into thin rectangles guarding the rows of seeds, pegged down at two of the four corners.
50m metres of three strands gets into what looks like quite a tangle on the extension floor. But resisted the temptation to meddle and it all pulled out OK. Remembering the Boy Scouts' adage that the worst way to deal with a tangle is to try to untangle it. (There is a proper word for this sort of thing but I can't remember what it is. Something of classical flavour. Aphorism perhaps? Maybe it will come to me by the time I next post). Learning, by the end, that the earth strand was, over the 50m, about 30cm longer than the shorter of the live and nuetral strands. With the longer being about 15cm longer than the shorter. Was this some quirk of the way that the stuff is made or was it some quirk of the way that I wound the three coppers back onto the reel?
So bring back the days when there was just one electricity company which was, no doubt, a bit dossy, but it had one rate for selling electricity and which one could trust not to rip one off too much. At least not by making large profits or paying their senior managers a lot more than I ever got paid. And even if they did make a large profit they were a nationalised industry so that was just a form of tax and so that was OK too.
But a mild counter stroke comes to mind, in the form of a short piece, I think from the Evening Standard, from the days when there was an Evening Standard and an Evening News, about how the divisional directors of London Buses did themselves OK, in a very discrete way, with elaborate panelled dining rooms and chauffer driven rollers. I guess this is all swept away now in the days of SouthWest trains the bosses of which no doubt go in for buying small Carribean Islands and hob-nobbing with P&B's. Maybe a bit of discrete self-indulgence was the lesser sin. I suppose the rich have a bit of a quandary here. A main point of being rich is to be richer than the next chap. And this does not have nearly so much savour if you don't know that the next chap knows it. But this also excites envy which might have untoward consequences. So do you enjoy your riches in private and bask in the dim glow of public approval or do you go for celeb-ration?
Yesterday, force majeure, we went in for a slighly novel recipe for the sage and onion stuffing with which to stuff our virgin reared organic vegetarian chicken from darkest Wales. Possibly from a subsidiary of the Duchy Grocers, definately via Cheam. The problem being that we had no sage - at least no more than a teaspoon of dried and no fresh - and no hazel nuts. We were reduced to using dried marjoram (which did not seem to smell of anything much at all) and Brazil nuts. Quite eatable but not, I think, quite up to snuff. Chicken went down OK though and the bones having been boiled for soup are now en-route to the compost bin. This last being a two stage process: into the bucket under the sink. From there to the dustbin on the patio. From there to the compost bin. The trick being to remember to empty the dustbin before it gets too heavy.
Yesterday our back lawn was more or less water-logged, although short of standing water. Very squishy to walk on, as I discovered when I went looking for the aforementioned sage. So this morning, when I finally have a slot to get back onto the allotment, is the ground going to be good for anything? Still, at the very least, I can take the cabbage cages to peices.
And I am now ready for the slugs. Decided not to spend £50 with Geo. Kelly on copper strips, rather to recycle the reel of 5 amp cable that had found its way into my garage roof. Maybe 50 meters of the stuff. I discovered that you could rip the white outer cover off: a good pull and one did about 60cm. Given that I had taken on some alcohol during the day, quite sweaty by the time I finished this first phase. Then left with a red plastic strand, a black plastic strand and a copper. Neither red plastic nor black plastic seemed to rip off so I had to take it of with a knife. Slightly faster - per strand - than the white stuff. Peel off a segment of the red (or black) cover, rather like peeling a potato, and the cover pulls off as easy as pie. Maybe 120cm at a time. All done by 2000.
I think I shall use the cable twisted into three, as it has been put back on the reel. Then make the twists up into L-shaped lengths. Maybe a metre long with 10cm returns. These can then be assembled into thin rectangles guarding the rows of seeds, pegged down at two of the four corners.
50m metres of three strands gets into what looks like quite a tangle on the extension floor. But resisted the temptation to meddle and it all pulled out OK. Remembering the Boy Scouts' adage that the worst way to deal with a tangle is to try to untangle it. (There is a proper word for this sort of thing but I can't remember what it is. Something of classical flavour. Aphorism perhaps? Maybe it will come to me by the time I next post). Learning, by the end, that the earth strand was, over the 50m, about 30cm longer than the shorter of the live and nuetral strands. With the longer being about 15cm longer than the shorter. Was this some quirk of the way that the stuff is made or was it some quirk of the way that I wound the three coppers back onto the reel?
Monday, May 18, 2009
Talking to them
Gas board visited the other day and pleased to record that they did not announce that our boiler was on the way out or sell us a sulphur trioxide or any other sort of detector. We hav'n't even got a letter from HQ pointing out that the ventilation of our boiler is not up to enlarged euro standard. So not a bad visit at all.
On the other hand, had another brush with the congestion charge yesterday. Bearing in mind my previous complaint (30/4/2009) that one cannot find out whether or not one has been in the congestion charge area, I find that you can indeed enter the zone without knowing, first, somewhere in the southern hinterland of Waterloo station and, second, somewhere in the northern hinterland of Kings Cross Station. The only clue was one post near St Thomas's hospital carrying a red 'C' which I correctly took to mean that I was in the congestion charge area and another near Vauxhall station with a struck through 'C' telling me that I was leaving it. Remain unimpressed with this job creation scheme for starving IT service companies.
Yesterday a mission to refill my compost bin, the level of which has been dangerously low since the winter clear out. Dangerously low in the sense that it might have been below the critical level needed to sustain arthropod life. So off to north London - hence the brush with the congestion charge - to collect no less than 13 dustbin bags of soft green garden waste, mostly lawn clippings. Compost bin now two thirds full although I fully expect it to revert to less than one third full once the waste has settled down. But it should be quite hot; the dustbin bags were quite warm to the touch after just four hours.
In course of all this, pushed by some police attended event out of Clapham High Street into Kings Road, which runs through an area known as Clapham Park. Very leafy with some rather handsome - if rather tired - houses of the order of 200 years old. Presumably a rather posh area at some point. Managed to get slightly lost coming through Streatham, winding up back on the Dorking Road at Tooting Bec rather than at Morden Hall Park as I had intended, at the cost of one hoot from some impatient youth in a banger. But perhaps just as well as there would have been plenty of scope, reading my ancient skip sourced A to Z while I drove, of getting even more lost around Mitcham. Must get onto A to Z replacement, the skip sourced one starting to look very tired. Unfortunately, last time I looked, Geograhers' don't seem to make this posh blue hard backed one any more. Might have to switch to the AA version which will take a bit of getting used to. Much prefer the Geographers' layout of twenty years ago. No date in the thing but a female hand has inscribed it February 2009.
Clapham High Street itself was awash with bicycles and motorcycles. They more or less filled up the bus lane, were weaving in out out of the cars in their lane and were spilling over into the north bound carriageway and onto the southbound pavement as need arose. Some of them seemed to have neither manners nor road sense. How long will be it be before the worm turns, and people start to withdraw the generous road facilities they have been accorded of recent years? Perhaps they should start by getting rid of the more or less useless cycle lanes, ignoring the inevitable protests from the road marking industry, which will thus lose much good business.
Prompted by an article somewhere recent about how the expiring fashion for gene science has not done quite what the applicants for research money had claimed for it, to close with a ponderous thought, fully worth the light of day - or perhaps the time of day - in some up-market saloon bar. That is to say, to think that a genome for some large animal is a bit like the machine code for a large computer program. Yes, you have all the information in principle and some features of the computer program can be picked out from the machine code. But for practical purposes, if you have lost the source code and the documentation of the program you are stuffed. Your chances of working it all out from the machine code are about nil.
On the other hand, had another brush with the congestion charge yesterday. Bearing in mind my previous complaint (30/4/2009) that one cannot find out whether or not one has been in the congestion charge area, I find that you can indeed enter the zone without knowing, first, somewhere in the southern hinterland of Waterloo station and, second, somewhere in the northern hinterland of Kings Cross Station. The only clue was one post near St Thomas's hospital carrying a red 'C' which I correctly took to mean that I was in the congestion charge area and another near Vauxhall station with a struck through 'C' telling me that I was leaving it. Remain unimpressed with this job creation scheme for starving IT service companies.
Yesterday a mission to refill my compost bin, the level of which has been dangerously low since the winter clear out. Dangerously low in the sense that it might have been below the critical level needed to sustain arthropod life. So off to north London - hence the brush with the congestion charge - to collect no less than 13 dustbin bags of soft green garden waste, mostly lawn clippings. Compost bin now two thirds full although I fully expect it to revert to less than one third full once the waste has settled down. But it should be quite hot; the dustbin bags were quite warm to the touch after just four hours.
In course of all this, pushed by some police attended event out of Clapham High Street into Kings Road, which runs through an area known as Clapham Park. Very leafy with some rather handsome - if rather tired - houses of the order of 200 years old. Presumably a rather posh area at some point. Managed to get slightly lost coming through Streatham, winding up back on the Dorking Road at Tooting Bec rather than at Morden Hall Park as I had intended, at the cost of one hoot from some impatient youth in a banger. But perhaps just as well as there would have been plenty of scope, reading my ancient skip sourced A to Z while I drove, of getting even more lost around Mitcham. Must get onto A to Z replacement, the skip sourced one starting to look very tired. Unfortunately, last time I looked, Geograhers' don't seem to make this posh blue hard backed one any more. Might have to switch to the AA version which will take a bit of getting used to. Much prefer the Geographers' layout of twenty years ago. No date in the thing but a female hand has inscribed it February 2009.
Clapham High Street itself was awash with bicycles and motorcycles. They more or less filled up the bus lane, were weaving in out out of the cars in their lane and were spilling over into the north bound carriageway and onto the southbound pavement as need arose. Some of them seemed to have neither manners nor road sense. How long will be it be before the worm turns, and people start to withdraw the generous road facilities they have been accorded of recent years? Perhaps they should start by getting rid of the more or less useless cycle lanes, ignoring the inevitable protests from the road marking industry, which will thus lose much good business.
Prompted by an article somewhere recent about how the expiring fashion for gene science has not done quite what the applicants for research money had claimed for it, to close with a ponderous thought, fully worth the light of day - or perhaps the time of day - in some up-market saloon bar. That is to say, to think that a genome for some large animal is a bit like the machine code for a large computer program. Yes, you have all the information in principle and some features of the computer program can be picked out from the machine code. But for practical purposes, if you have lost the source code and the documentation of the program you are stuffed. Your chances of working it all out from the machine code are about nil.
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Bicycle grief
New transmission causing problems. Interesting clicking noises from somewhere, which one could hear but not feel. Seemed to correlate with the rotations of the crank rather than anything else. Rather ominous slow throbbing through the saddle telling me the new back wheel is out of true. Inspection of back wheel shows that flashy and fairly new continental tyre is falling apart and starting to bulge alarmingly in places. This last being down to me, having failed to pump the thing up to the recommended 60ppi. Off to the bicycle shop to collect flashy new bicycle pump. Upright, a bit like one of the old stirrup pumps. With a pressure guage. I am told that I ought to check the pressure once a week. Shop man waves tools at crank, does not appear to do anything much and mysteriously the clicking has yet to reappear. Fiddled with the spokes and that is not quite right yet but we will await new tyre before fussing any more about that. He does not seem to think that true is a big deal. He is much more interested in the new control cables stretching, which does not seem to be happening as fast as he would have expected.
Pending concrete activity down the bottom of the garden, a concrete dream last night. Now we have a garden shed which is rotting because I built it into the side of a slight hill without taking proper care of waterproofing arrangements, which means that part of the floor and associated parts is rotting. So, from time to time, I ponder about whether to replace it. So last night, I decide that a concrete shed was just the thing. Would take no time at all to knock such a thing up. Plenty of scrap timber in the garage to make the shuttering out of. No need to bother about windows, just make a concrete box. Might be a bit dark but never mind. I don't seem to be concerned about the roof or the door. But then, presumably close to waking and bits of the brain booting up, I start to wonder about how thick the concrete ought to be. Settle for four inches. You can make concrete thinner than this, but not if you are doing it by hand without any mechanical tamping aids. Then start to think. The shed needs to be at least six feet high. Point A, this is more thin concrete than can be cast in-situ in one go. And it has to be in-situ as it would be too heavy to lift single handed. Point B, this is rather a lot of shuttering. Point C, will need scaffolding from which to pour the concrete into the shutter. Point D, we are talking about maybe 12 square metres of wall which amounts to more than a cubic metre of concrete. This is rather a lot of concrete to be knocking up with a shovel in a wooden tray. Still more or less asleep at this point, but now starting to wake up and unravel the whole problem. Maybe a DIY concrete shed is not really the way forward.
But by way of compensation, I do have the buttress to make for the compost bin at the bottom of the garden. The compost bin is made of brick, two sides and a back, maybe 18 inches high. Wooden front and wooden top to keep the rats out and the mice warm. Unfortunately, while the left hand side is properly bonded to the back, the back right hand corner is occupied by a short concrete post and there is no bonding between the right hand side and the back. With the result that the right hand side is now slowly twisting and falling, outwards. Maybe 20 degrees from vertical at the front. So I decided that a concrete buttress is the answer. Would be best in the middle but that is rather awkward, so have settled for the front. Made a neat little shutter for the buttress, maybe a bit less than a cubic foot in volume. Bought three bags of aggregate which I thought was plenty. Started mixing and filling operations, when it rapidly became apparent that my guess of three bags was well out. I should have measured rather than guessed. I should have got more like six bags of aggregate, and a new bag of cement. So the buttress is now going to be in two layers. Hopefully the two layers will bond OK without the aid of any connecting reinforcing bars.
Made the first layer concrete in three mixes, one for each bag. The first dry, probably the right thing at the bottom of the hole. The second rather wetter, probably the result of chucking in half a bag of sand I happened to have lying around and wanted to tidy up, and the third, by accident, very wet. The right mix was probably somewhere between the first and the second mix. Bearing in mind that I was rather short of concrete, had run out of sand and shop aggregate, decided that the way forward was to add more aggregate to the third mix, in the form of gravel from around the bay window to the extension and broken ancient brick, irregular lumps ranging up to a maximum of two inches across. The concrete having aleady been mixed, it had some difficulty wetting the ancient brick, despite being very wet itself, but it probably got there, this difficulty being the reason that one is supposed to mix concrete in one go, without adding things later. I don't suppose this part of the buttress is going to be terribly strong, but hopefully still fit for purpose. And the second layer, if made in a more conventional way will reinforce it a bit.
And then I found that I had forgotten how strong shutters need to be. Wet concrete is heavy stuff and will push one inch screws out of chip board without any problem at all. Poor workmanship, but after the dust has settled I do not suppose anyone other than me will notice. Second layer to be continued when we get our shiny new car back from being made shiny new again after an altercation with a post.
Friday, July 31, 2009
More news from the Grauniad
Yesterday it carried a tear jerking piece about the dreadful fate of a fairly small number of refugees from Eritrea holed up in some frightful squat in Calais. It seems that Eritrea has got itself into a bit of a state and is now a very unpleasant country, on a par with Burma or the Sudan. I forget how it came to be that way, no doubt in some large part a legacy of the filthy colonial oppression from the filthy oppressors from western Europe. So, to that extent, we owe. However, what the Grauniad does not do, is make any positive suggestions about what we might do about the situation. It seems clear to me that no one country can afford to have an open door policy these days, even for refugees here for more complicated reasons than a simple desire to have a better life, perhaps including cookers, ice-cream and televisions, than that available at their natal homes. The technical term for those that are not, being, I believe, economic migrants. As opposed to political refugees and other dissidents who have fallen out with their powers that be. There are just too many of them and we are not going to be able to cope. So where is the discussion about what it is reasonable for us to do? Is our record comparable with that of our neighbours? How far is our charity going to reach? As far as interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state we do not much care for?
But to re-position myself away from what might sound a bit BNP, I should say again (vide supra) that my belief is that the world will become an increasingly troublesome place unless we do something about the gross inequality that presently pervades it. If we with the money do not pour a good chunk of that money into sorting that inequality out, we might find ourself in a bit of a pickle. Quite apart from any considerations of morality and decency. Which is all well and good, but apart from not wanting to part with the dosh, we have not yet learnt how to apply it very effectively. An awful lot of the aid money there is seems to disappear down some drain or other.
Nearer home, finally gotten around to striking the shuttering from the buttress to the right hand wall of the compost bin at the bottom of the back garden, having dutifully watered the curing concrete over the past week or so, a process which is supposed to increase its final compressive strength by up to 32%. Started off by learning that taking out a cross head screw from an awkward place is a lot less awkward than taking out an ordinary screw from the same place. The tip of the screwdriver stays in its hole in the top of the screw. Then learnt that there are at least two sorts of cross head screws as the screwdriver I was using did not work on taking out the last screw, despite being the screwdriver which put it in in the first place, and despite all the screws looking the same. But came out as sweet as pie when I changed screwdriver. Screws out, three of the six peices of chipboard making up the shutter fell off without bother. That left the three large peices - back, front and right hand side - firmly embedded in the soil at the base of the buttress. A bit of waggling and the front came out. Rather more serious waggling and the side came out. But the back, the most awkward, was not playing the game. Out with the cold chisel and club hammer and starting smashing it up. At which point it gave in gracefully and I was able to pull it out, more or less in one peice.
I then find that the second lift has come out a pale grey while the first lift has come out a pale brown. So we have a two tone buttress. But the good news is that the bond between first and second lift looks good. I shall be very surprised if it comes adrift by natural causes. So now, I can relax, the buttress project can be closed and I can fill up the compost bin to my heart's content, not having to worry about whether the right hand retaining wall is about to keel over on me. Post implementation review scheduled for 31st July next, a day which, as it happens, will be the 38th anniversary of my wedding, God willing as they say in the wee frees.
Yesterday was also the day of the lamb cutlets, for the second time in the recent past. Mushroom soup as an appetiser, made by simply simmering a few mushrooms - more or less entire but with the stalks chopped - in a little butter, water and black pepper (pestle and mortar variety). Followed by the cutlets grilled, summer cabbage boiled and mashed potato. Important to grill the chops rather than bake them. The latter tends to result in a rather dry product; with a grill one can monitor operations and tweak heat, position and so forth. More bother but more result. The bit I was not too sure about was adding the remains of the mushroom soup to the potato before mashing. It did impart a bit of flavour, but also a rather grey tinge colour-wise. Not too attractive, so not next time.
Monday, June 11, 2007
So what are walls for?
The FIL pix shows a very impressive and ancient monument, but what was it really for? If there were people about organised enough to build such a thing, there would be other people who would not find it that hard to knock a hole through it. I would have thought that a hundred undisturbed men with crowbars and such could knock a hole suitable for cavalry in a day or so. And could you really garrison the whole thing? Who gets posted out into the wilds portrayed? Punishment for borrowing one of the emperor's concubines? Does anyone know? Maybe I will be asking Wiki shortly.
A modest senior moment today when I almost brushed the breadcrumbs from the bread board into the grocery cupboard rather than that containing the compost bucket.
The compost itself is the subject of an experiment. We have acquired several pounds of dry goods - flour, sugar, rice and the like - which had been sitting in an attic for maybe twenty years. Looked OK but we were a bit too squeamish to actually eat the stuff so it has been used to feed the compost bin at the bottom of the garden. The thing is, are we going to have a generation of obese or diabetic slugs and worms as a result of this grossly enhanced diet? Are the rats going to make serious attempts to gnaw their way through the protective chipboard at the front of the bin to get at the stuff? If pushed, I'm sure they could make it, despite the hard plastic coating. With a bit of brain power they might just tunnel under rather than gnaw through.
A rather differant sort of senior moment in the book I am reading about the Armenian massacres (which, as ever, turn out to be a more complicated - although still very evil - business than one had first thought). Lots of people seem to be called Blogs Bey or Fred Pasa (s cedilla I think). It has taken me three quarters of the book to realise that Bey and Pasa are titles - like Lord or Sir - which the Turks in their wisdom place after the family name rather than before. Pasa does not appear in my dictionary but Pasha and Basha do. The dictionary comes down on the side of the view that Pasha and Basha are the same word so I can probably roll Pasa in too.
Any yet another book, this time about Burma. It seems that Burma has never been a neat and tidy country in the way that England has been for getting on for a thousand years - and like Ottoman Anatolia contains a very mixed population - although as a result of unpleasant goings on since the last war, rather less mixed that it used to be. Not a good recipe for a rapid transition to modern nation statehood. Said transition being made even harder by North Eastern Burma being invaded by a very substantial remnant from the losing side at the end of the Chinese civil war. Also that the much hated Ne Win was, as a young man, the most effective soldier around - a quality which fuelled his rise to the top - but which did not prevent his fall from grace.
Cut up on the way to or from Cheam three times in the last week. On the first occasion, a little old lady in her little old car overtakes me and turns smartly left. On the second, I am overtaken on the inside (there being less than two feet between me and the kerb) by a postman on a bicycle at traffic lights where I was hoping to turn left. On the third, I think a variant of the little old lady but I forget the detail. No doubt it will come back when I log out.
Experimented with lemon soles last week - having arrived at the baker (this being where the fish van parks) too late for the depleted summer catches of proper white fish. Not hugely impressed. BH did an excellent job of cooking and presentation (entire, dark side up with incisions), but the flesh was a bit mushy for me, especially that under the rather substantial bone. In fact, not only mushy but thin on the ground. One only got to eat maybe a third of the bought weight.
A modest senior moment today when I almost brushed the breadcrumbs from the bread board into the grocery cupboard rather than that containing the compost bucket.
The compost itself is the subject of an experiment. We have acquired several pounds of dry goods - flour, sugar, rice and the like - which had been sitting in an attic for maybe twenty years. Looked OK but we were a bit too squeamish to actually eat the stuff so it has been used to feed the compost bin at the bottom of the garden. The thing is, are we going to have a generation of obese or diabetic slugs and worms as a result of this grossly enhanced diet? Are the rats going to make serious attempts to gnaw their way through the protective chipboard at the front of the bin to get at the stuff? If pushed, I'm sure they could make it, despite the hard plastic coating. With a bit of brain power they might just tunnel under rather than gnaw through.
A rather differant sort of senior moment in the book I am reading about the Armenian massacres (which, as ever, turn out to be a more complicated - although still very evil - business than one had first thought). Lots of people seem to be called Blogs Bey or Fred Pasa (s cedilla I think). It has taken me three quarters of the book to realise that Bey and Pasa are titles - like Lord or Sir - which the Turks in their wisdom place after the family name rather than before. Pasa does not appear in my dictionary but Pasha and Basha do. The dictionary comes down on the side of the view that Pasha and Basha are the same word so I can probably roll Pasa in too.
Any yet another book, this time about Burma. It seems that Burma has never been a neat and tidy country in the way that England has been for getting on for a thousand years - and like Ottoman Anatolia contains a very mixed population - although as a result of unpleasant goings on since the last war, rather less mixed that it used to be. Not a good recipe for a rapid transition to modern nation statehood. Said transition being made even harder by North Eastern Burma being invaded by a very substantial remnant from the losing side at the end of the Chinese civil war. Also that the much hated Ne Win was, as a young man, the most effective soldier around - a quality which fuelled his rise to the top - but which did not prevent his fall from grace.
Cut up on the way to or from Cheam three times in the last week. On the first occasion, a little old lady in her little old car overtakes me and turns smartly left. On the second, I am overtaken on the inside (there being less than two feet between me and the kerb) by a postman on a bicycle at traffic lights where I was hoping to turn left. On the third, I think a variant of the little old lady but I forget the detail. No doubt it will come back when I log out.
Experimented with lemon soles last week - having arrived at the baker (this being where the fish van parks) too late for the depleted summer catches of proper white fish. Not hugely impressed. BH did an excellent job of cooking and presentation (entire, dark side up with incisions), but the flesh was a bit mushy for me, especially that under the rather substantial bone. In fact, not only mushy but thin on the ground. One only got to eat maybe a third of the bought weight.
Wednesday, January 02, 2008
New year factoids
One of them an old year hangover. That is to say, where in the vegetable world can one find perfect spheres? Answer, the mistletoe plants, of which there are plenty, in the trees at Hampton Court. Some of them of impressive size, perhaps a couple of feet across.
The second concerns the nannies and their tame statisticians (of which I used to be one). It seems that for the purposes of gathering statistics, any road accident or incident in which any of those involved has had a drink, is recorded as an accident involving drink. So my running over a drunk who leaps out from behind a parked lorry counts. This is, of course, OK as far as it goes. But one then needs to be a touch careful about interpreting large increases in accidents involving drink as a reason for banning drink. One might spoil what is probably a good story - that many or most road accidents are caused by drivers who have had a drink - by overstatement.
I should also mention that I am mildy in favour of a zero alcohol rule for driving. An inconvenience for those who live in the country but most of us have reasonable access to pubs, buses and taxis, and a no alcohol rule is a much more straightforward to abide by and to enforce than a some alcohol rule.
I was reminded of this by driving behind a bus today which had one of those moving light signs that they have on railway stations - the thing that tells you where the next train is stopping, a string which is far too long to fit on the display all at once - incorporated into it's rear end in a panel perhaps two feet by one foot. At a time when the nannies are cranking up the penalties for all sort of in-car misdemeanours like using a mobile phone, talking to your partner, lighting up or having a sweet - bus companies are allowed to add in this dangerous way to the already huge amount of off-car clutter on today's roads - my point being that I find off-car clutter as distracting and thus potentially as dangerous as the on-car sort. And while we are on this vein are we sure that satnavs add to road safety? Is continually glancing at a small screen which one can only see (in my case) with difficulty, adding or subtracting to the chance of having an accident?
Having caught our fourth mouse in the series, in the garage, shortly after Christmas, the trap has now lain unsprung for several days. Maybe we have seen the mice off. On the other hand, the rat poison in the compost heap is still moving - although there are now none of the excavations that we had before. Maybe there are some more mice down there. So now, having spent £15 on rat poison, starting to think seriously about replacing our brick compost bin which is very easy to use (and also makes a very good boundary marker against encroachments by any pushy neighbours there might be in that corner) but very hard to make rodent proof, with a couple of green plastic jobs. Which might cost £100? If they have open bottoms - which I would have thought necessary for compost - are they still rat proof? Will they try to burrow in? How do you keep the compost wet enough if it is in, in effect, a plastic bag? Watch this space.
The second concerns the nannies and their tame statisticians (of which I used to be one). It seems that for the purposes of gathering statistics, any road accident or incident in which any of those involved has had a drink, is recorded as an accident involving drink. So my running over a drunk who leaps out from behind a parked lorry counts. This is, of course, OK as far as it goes. But one then needs to be a touch careful about interpreting large increases in accidents involving drink as a reason for banning drink. One might spoil what is probably a good story - that many or most road accidents are caused by drivers who have had a drink - by overstatement.
I should also mention that I am mildy in favour of a zero alcohol rule for driving. An inconvenience for those who live in the country but most of us have reasonable access to pubs, buses and taxis, and a no alcohol rule is a much more straightforward to abide by and to enforce than a some alcohol rule.
I was reminded of this by driving behind a bus today which had one of those moving light signs that they have on railway stations - the thing that tells you where the next train is stopping, a string which is far too long to fit on the display all at once - incorporated into it's rear end in a panel perhaps two feet by one foot. At a time when the nannies are cranking up the penalties for all sort of in-car misdemeanours like using a mobile phone, talking to your partner, lighting up or having a sweet - bus companies are allowed to add in this dangerous way to the already huge amount of off-car clutter on today's roads - my point being that I find off-car clutter as distracting and thus potentially as dangerous as the on-car sort. And while we are on this vein are we sure that satnavs add to road safety? Is continually glancing at a small screen which one can only see (in my case) with difficulty, adding or subtracting to the chance of having an accident?
Having caught our fourth mouse in the series, in the garage, shortly after Christmas, the trap has now lain unsprung for several days. Maybe we have seen the mice off. On the other hand, the rat poison in the compost heap is still moving - although there are now none of the excavations that we had before. Maybe there are some more mice down there. So now, having spent £15 on rat poison, starting to think seriously about replacing our brick compost bin which is very easy to use (and also makes a very good boundary marker against encroachments by any pushy neighbours there might be in that corner) but very hard to make rodent proof, with a couple of green plastic jobs. Which might cost £100? If they have open bottoms - which I would have thought necessary for compost - are they still rat proof? Will they try to burrow in? How do you keep the compost wet enough if it is in, in effect, a plastic bag? Watch this space.
Monday, September 24, 2007
Country smells (2)
Having filled FIL's old water tank with fresh cut comphrey leaves (said by mediaevals to be good for inflammations and broken bones) it now smells rotten. Various wasp like hover flies seem to quite like it. The idea is that the green liquid which will result in due course is very good for runner beans. I hope so because the comphrey is really good at coming up good and strong everywhere except where I plant it on purpose. Maybe it likes being chopped up and replanted along with the rest of the compost.
We also have a wire thief. Had left what was left of the line wire from the deer exclosure hanging up on the pole bin. Noticed yesterday, when I wanted it, that it had gone missing (at least I don't think that I returned it to the alternative hanging place in our garage roof). Only a few pounds worth but depressing that even in a small closed community like allotment holders you get the odd thief. Presumably communes of bubble or other substance loving folk have the same problem: no way of weeding out the bad apples which is not worse than the problem.
This in the course of replacing one side of the compost bin. A neighbouring landscaping contractor was loading his skip up with the pallets from the stone he was laying and was happy for us to remove them, so we acquired five pallets plus sundry other bits and bobs making up the stone crates. On acquisition, we learn that stone pallets are made in a much heavier fashion that the regular sort and are rather smaller - maybe three feet square rather than four feet square. Maybe this means that they do not recycle in the same way. That being as it may, three of the new sturdy pallets did a good job of replacing two old ones, the new shape serving to lock the two sides adjacent - which had been wobbling a bit - properly in. The bits and bobs served to make a sort of upper palisade, compensating in a feeble way for the lack of height, but with the unintended side effect that the whole thing now has a slightly more amateurish look than it used to, despite actually being rather stronger.
Also learnt that the bashing that nails take when you extract them from pallets leaves them rather soft, and very prone to disastrous bending when trying to use them. Maybe not just the softness but also their having been hammered straight. The resultant nail is not quite true and must have slight bends at which there is a tendency to buckle under stress. All adds to the amateurish look noted above.
The Bulgarian wheat is coming up well. There are a lot of shoots, about two inches high now and looking curiously fragile. We will see how many of them survice the various horrors which lurk in the dark.
Reminded by a peice in today's DT about how much I disapprove of husband and wife teams in the workplace. The peice in question suggesting that some of Blairs heirs share their late leader's love of money - to the extent of being economical with the spirit if not the letter of the rules in such matters. Maybe it is a prejudice inherited from my mother, and I have never had to work with a husband and wife team, but I am sure that I would have found it a pain. A little clique - or perhaps boil - in the otherwise healthy body politic. Maybe the BBB will find time to make rules about it when they have first hand experience.
We also have a wire thief. Had left what was left of the line wire from the deer exclosure hanging up on the pole bin. Noticed yesterday, when I wanted it, that it had gone missing (at least I don't think that I returned it to the alternative hanging place in our garage roof). Only a few pounds worth but depressing that even in a small closed community like allotment holders you get the odd thief. Presumably communes of bubble or other substance loving folk have the same problem: no way of weeding out the bad apples which is not worse than the problem.
This in the course of replacing one side of the compost bin. A neighbouring landscaping contractor was loading his skip up with the pallets from the stone he was laying and was happy for us to remove them, so we acquired five pallets plus sundry other bits and bobs making up the stone crates. On acquisition, we learn that stone pallets are made in a much heavier fashion that the regular sort and are rather smaller - maybe three feet square rather than four feet square. Maybe this means that they do not recycle in the same way. That being as it may, three of the new sturdy pallets did a good job of replacing two old ones, the new shape serving to lock the two sides adjacent - which had been wobbling a bit - properly in. The bits and bobs served to make a sort of upper palisade, compensating in a feeble way for the lack of height, but with the unintended side effect that the whole thing now has a slightly more amateurish look than it used to, despite actually being rather stronger.
Also learnt that the bashing that nails take when you extract them from pallets leaves them rather soft, and very prone to disastrous bending when trying to use them. Maybe not just the softness but also their having been hammered straight. The resultant nail is not quite true and must have slight bends at which there is a tendency to buckle under stress. All adds to the amateurish look noted above.
The Bulgarian wheat is coming up well. There are a lot of shoots, about two inches high now and looking curiously fragile. We will see how many of them survice the various horrors which lurk in the dark.
Reminded by a peice in today's DT about how much I disapprove of husband and wife teams in the workplace. The peice in question suggesting that some of Blairs heirs share their late leader's love of money - to the extent of being economical with the spirit if not the letter of the rules in such matters. Maybe it is a prejudice inherited from my mother, and I have never had to work with a husband and wife team, but I am sure that I would have found it a pain. A little clique - or perhaps boil - in the otherwise healthy body politic. Maybe the BBB will find time to make rules about it when they have first hand experience.
Friday, October 15, 2010
Feast
Ornithological feast this morning. Around 0830 the back garden was very busy with birds on the bushes, particularly the fire thorn with its red berries and the yew with its pink ones. Lots of blue tits and great tits. One regular thrush, one irregular thrush. One green woodpecker, one red, white and black job. Several chaffinches. Several unidentified small brown birds. The odd blackbird, pigeon, starling and robin. One magpie flew overhead, clearly disdaining this veggie. fare.
The red worms in the compost dustbin were clearly not happy just waiting for their transfer to the compost bin. Making determined bids for escape. Which all goes to show that they must be worms of very little brain as they would be snapped up by the aforementioned birds in no time. However, I have now emptied the dustbin into the bin and most of the worms are back where they are supposed to be. How will they get on with the smell of fresh Dulux Weathershield, which the blurb on the tin suggests should not be used indoors as Dulux cannot be responsible for any unpleasant ailments you might catch in consequence?
Have now received the Autumn newsletter of the chain saw gang. They tell us that they have now chopped down enough trees to make room for 23 cows. So they are now pumping 23 cows worth of global warming into the sky all day every day. A regular 24 by 7 job.They appeal for volunteers to play herdsmen and women: it seems that one is supposed to peer at the cows' tongues every day to make sure that they are not ailing. Why do they bother? Why can't they play at Horton Park Childrens' Farm and leave our common out of it? Possibly because they don't have cows there any more, in case the children touch them and catch some unpleasant ailment that way. Lot of fuss in the papers on this account a year or so ago. But they do have a large play barn where the children can tear around shouting on apparatus. Perhaps this is what Childrens' Farms are really for.
And a little while ago I read in one of our free papers that the chain saw gang have been awarded some award for their management of Epsom Common. To quote the press release: 'Epsom Common Local Nature Reserve has won the Green Flag Award for the first time. The Green Flag scheme, which has been running for 11 years, awards those parks and open spaces judged to be welcoming, safe and well maintained and involve the local community'. Mr Google tells me that the Green Flag award is a subsidiary operation of the 'Keep Britain Tidy' campaign: see http://www.keepbritaintidy.org/. Presumably leaving dead trees lying around does not count as litter.
Picked up a book of reminiscences by J. Conrad yesterday from which I share three snippets. First, it seems that if you are a seaman used to being up close and personal with wild and hellish seas, the idea of drowning in a calm sun-lit pond seems all very calm and peaceful. Not like being sucked into the mouth of hell at all. Second, he gets very hot and bothered about people who talk about casting anchor. He says that anchors are far too heavy for casting; one just drops them. Odd that the casting word should have irritated him so much. Perhaps I will find out as I read on. Third, the magic went out of seafaring for him when sail gave way to steam. A sailing ship was a beautiful, but frail and wayward thing which needed love and art to survive. A steam ship just trudges through. No love or art at all by comparison.
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Bin alert
We conducted spot check of the bin situation in our road at 0730 Monday, Monday being bin day. Brown bin alternate day. Out of 137.5 households (the 3 suspected squats counting as 0.5 each), 27% did not appear to know that it was bin day at all. 38% did not know that it was the alternate brown day and had put out their green bin (old-style) . 41% did not appear to have any food waste - and it seems unlikely that all of them compost all their food waste. 22% did not appear to have any newspapers, glass or tins - and again it seems unlikely that this is a true reflection of the numbers not generating any such waste. So we clearly have a long way to go. Perhaps the council ought to organise a litter night at TB, with a free pint for everyone that turns up with their recycling leaflet. Alternatively, an obvious opportunity for any busy who has tired of neighbourhood watch.
On the other hand, the Internet bizzies are alive and well. It seems that the provider of every bit of software on this PC has decided to go in for online update this week. There seems to be no end to the unsolicited pop-ups inviting me to take the latest whizzy release of whatever it is. All very tiresome; although one hesitates before rejecting them as the updates may actually be useful. So, for example, the PC spent some time yesterday taking an update from the BT Broadband Online Support System (B-Boss to cognoscenti, aka B-Brother). But I took it because it may save time when the time comes for the next huddle with their Bangalore help desk.
A very kind review of 'Brooklyn' in a recent edition of the NYRB (see 14/6/2009). It was a review by a lady which may partly account for it being kinder than my short notice. Review extended to 7 columns (less a couple of smallish pictures), so a substantial affair. First column given over to a slightly relevant anecdote drawn from the reviewer's own life. Remainder more or less given over to a resume of the book, which is good, considering how few reviews bother to do more than wave at it occasionally, in the margins of punting some hobby horse of the reviewer's. In this case the chosen comparator was James rather than Joyce. Maybe there is a connection of exiled single women, but James is very dense compared with Toibin. Perhaps I should take a peek at both Brooklyn and James again.
There was also an interesting peice about the economy, in the course of which it was explained that the financial services sector, while doing stalwart duty in keeping the rest of us going, also manages to absorb a large chunk of national product in their own pay and rations. The actual size of the chunk being a rather dodgy quantity. The article talks of the sector generating 30% of all corporate profits, where this excludes pay and rations. Corporate profits being what funds the income drawn by shareholders but not that drawn by employees, so presumably only a small proportion of national product. Must take another peek at those tricky national accounts in my remaindered annual abstract of statistics. But either way, this seems to be quite a big bill to pay for efficient allocation of capital (this being what we are told the financial services sector is for, apart from the dull businesses of insurance and retail banking). Particularly when they have been spectacularly bad at it of late.
Then, on the way to Cheam, got to pondering about who were the winners in the banking mess. So we start with a farmer, in the fringes of some big mid western town in the US, who sells his land to a developer. Better than not growing alfafa. So the farmer has got his dosh and so he is OK. The developer pays a builder to build the houses. The builder gets his dosh so he is OK. The developer then sells the house to a punter so he is OK. The farmer, the builder and the developer have now trousered the (as it turns out) inflated value of a lot of houses. The punter borrows the money off a bank, this last being gorged with cheap dosh from the hard working Chinese who have nowhere else to put it. Punter, being sub-prime, doesn't meet his payments. So the banks, or perhaps in the long run, the Chinese, take a bit of a pasting. But there are clearly lots of winners in this game. So why are they not spending us out of the recession?
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Compost bin lid (1)
The old lid collapsed as I was removing it. The interior was fairly busy. But these worms, and their cousins, have been transferred to the compost dustbin for return to the compost heap in due course. Waste not, want not.Thursday, November 08, 2007
Sausages (concluded)
The sausages of October 31 with the Porky White labels have now been consumed as part of a toad in the hole. Sad to report, the sausages were so full of some sickly sweet flavouring that one was unable to tell whether they had absorbed any Porky Whiteness from the label. I suspect not. Texture not right either - too finely ground - this last usually being a sign of cheap ingredients (the sort of thing not fit to put in a pork pie - or is it the other way around?) which need to be ground down fine to make them edible.
October 31st reminds me that I ought to have a pop at Halloween. The papers are full of ecotwad of one sort and another, the answer to which has to be that collectively we have to consume less of everything. Then the shops were full of all sorts of heavily advertised junk and junk food which our children will pester us to buy. Wouldn't the world be a much healthier place if the whole operation had been missed out? And if our children had done something wholesome like spending weeks making a guy... How many of them have got a clue what a guy is or means? We have to persuade them that having fun does not have to depend on spending money and conspicuous consumption of one sort or another. Or at least that there are cheaper ways of being conspicuous, if that is the objective. Which will be hard as long as we have big companies who want to be bigger companies and who have bigger advertising budgets than I do.
Halloween is an easy target, which, despite its ancient origins, in it's present form in England, is an invention of said big companies. But some of us might feel much the same about Christmas. I seem to remember some Californian called Vance Packard having a go at all this sort of thing in the revolutionary sixties (of the last century). Perhaps it is time we wheeled him out again.
The rats have returned! Having enclosed the brick compost bin at the bottom of the garden to stop the foxes getting in, the rats have now set up house. Don't quite see how I am going to make the thing rat proof and I don't want to move over to one of those little plastic barrells from the council. Don't like the idea of all that fossil fuel being locked up in heavy duty green plastic apart from anything else. As it happens we have a couple of rat traps, left over from some previous abode - vicious things which would do something very unpleasant to a finger if handled carelessly. These have now been primed with the finest bacon from Mr S and placed one at each end of the service road which the rats have built right at the back of the bin, where it is not usually opened. No luck on the first night. Maybe the foxes did something useful and grabbed them.
Have now finished the first pass of Uncle Tom's Cabin, and perhaps got a bit nearer to why to be called Uncle Tomist is insulting. While the thing is a tear jerker, written by a decent white middle class lady and so the whole thing is very much from that point of view, I do not know of a better take on what life might have been like in the slave states in the years before the civil war. One can overlook the unlikely plot given that it was much better written than I had expected, with the various white takes on slaves (and I had forgotten that a proportion of these last were also white and could pass as free) and slavery being described in a much more sensitive way than I had expected. Speaking for myself, this 400 page, four day reminder of this part of our history was salutary. A reminder, for example, that many otherwise decent white men were responsible for much evil by omission. That power does indeed corrupt children. That lack of power corrupts too (something which it has taken the Irish some years to get over). And that many Northerners who professed to abhor slavery were not so keen on black people in their own neighbourhoods, let alone their own kitchens. The South was a nice long way away.
But I can also see that a black reader might not be impressed by the implausibly Christian stoicism of the hero. They might think that taking a hatchet to a drunk and brutal planter might have been a better way forward than turning the other cheek. Although writing that, I am reminded that early Chrisitans impressed by their willingness to be gentle martyrs for the cause. Perhaps the author had them in mind (who should, whatever one might think of the book now, be given much credit for being first to reach a large public).
And on a less solemn note, I have learnt that a critter is a variant of creature, originally used in connection with the two legged sort, God's own creatures, rather than the small four legged sort.
October 31st reminds me that I ought to have a pop at Halloween. The papers are full of ecotwad of one sort and another, the answer to which has to be that collectively we have to consume less of everything. Then the shops were full of all sorts of heavily advertised junk and junk food which our children will pester us to buy. Wouldn't the world be a much healthier place if the whole operation had been missed out? And if our children had done something wholesome like spending weeks making a guy... How many of them have got a clue what a guy is or means? We have to persuade them that having fun does not have to depend on spending money and conspicuous consumption of one sort or another. Or at least that there are cheaper ways of being conspicuous, if that is the objective. Which will be hard as long as we have big companies who want to be bigger companies and who have bigger advertising budgets than I do.
Halloween is an easy target, which, despite its ancient origins, in it's present form in England, is an invention of said big companies. But some of us might feel much the same about Christmas. I seem to remember some Californian called Vance Packard having a go at all this sort of thing in the revolutionary sixties (of the last century). Perhaps it is time we wheeled him out again.
The rats have returned! Having enclosed the brick compost bin at the bottom of the garden to stop the foxes getting in, the rats have now set up house. Don't quite see how I am going to make the thing rat proof and I don't want to move over to one of those little plastic barrells from the council. Don't like the idea of all that fossil fuel being locked up in heavy duty green plastic apart from anything else. As it happens we have a couple of rat traps, left over from some previous abode - vicious things which would do something very unpleasant to a finger if handled carelessly. These have now been primed with the finest bacon from Mr S and placed one at each end of the service road which the rats have built right at the back of the bin, where it is not usually opened. No luck on the first night. Maybe the foxes did something useful and grabbed them.
Have now finished the first pass of Uncle Tom's Cabin, and perhaps got a bit nearer to why to be called Uncle Tomist is insulting. While the thing is a tear jerker, written by a decent white middle class lady and so the whole thing is very much from that point of view, I do not know of a better take on what life might have been like in the slave states in the years before the civil war. One can overlook the unlikely plot given that it was much better written than I had expected, with the various white takes on slaves (and I had forgotten that a proportion of these last were also white and could pass as free) and slavery being described in a much more sensitive way than I had expected. Speaking for myself, this 400 page, four day reminder of this part of our history was salutary. A reminder, for example, that many otherwise decent white men were responsible for much evil by omission. That power does indeed corrupt children. That lack of power corrupts too (something which it has taken the Irish some years to get over). And that many Northerners who professed to abhor slavery were not so keen on black people in their own neighbourhoods, let alone their own kitchens. The South was a nice long way away.
But I can also see that a black reader might not be impressed by the implausibly Christian stoicism of the hero. They might think that taking a hatchet to a drunk and brutal planter might have been a better way forward than turning the other cheek. Although writing that, I am reminded that early Chrisitans impressed by their willingness to be gentle martyrs for the cause. Perhaps the author had them in mind (who should, whatever one might think of the book now, be given much credit for being first to reach a large public).
And on a less solemn note, I have learnt that a critter is a variant of creature, originally used in connection with the two legged sort, God's own creatures, rather than the small four legged sort.
Thursday, June 09, 2011
Monsters behind the bin
BH spotted a monster stag beetle lurking behind the compost bin on the patio. The body of the thing was about two inches long, the largest either of us have ever seen. Indeed, not seen one at all for a while. There was also a reddish tint to the black, especially around the claws. Also something not seen before.FIL, however, claimed that he had seen much bigger and better specimens in Devon. Perhaps they like the wet there.
But it remains a mystery what the thing is doing there or how it got there. Yards and yards from the nearest open ground. Now been there for at least 24 hours. Can they fly?
