Thursday, September 30, 2010

 

Bubbles (2)

I don't remember seeing a thing like this in the late sixties but it would have been an excellent accessory for a flower child.

The better ones are hand forged from bronze and are placed outside Buddhist temples in Tibet and elsewhere. You rub the handles with the palms of your hands and if the water dances you get a wish.

When the lady of the shop demonstrated it all looked very easy. But at least I could be sure the thing worked and so persevered for the week or so it has taken me to make the water dance. First off, placed it on a small concrete slab, something less than a foot square, on the dining table. Cover the slab with a tea towel to stop the bowl being scratched. After a while I was getting interesting ringing noises. When the tone hit the right pitch the surface of the water did indeed start to vibrate, working in from four corners. But no dancing.

Second attempt, mount the slab in the vice of my woodwork bench and try again. Same result. Much ringing but no dancing. And I am putting in a lot more effort than the lady of the shop. Hands starting to get a bit tender. At least the ringing is outside and not on BH nerves.

Third attempt, use a couple of sheets of paper instead of the tea towel. Slight improvement.

Fourth attempt, put a roof tile on top of the slab and the paper on top of the roof tile. Tile is slightly curved and the contact area much lower than it had been on the slab direct. Almost immediately we get dancing. Not over the whole surface of the bowl, but maybe a third. Water dancing up to maybe two inches. Tone much lower than that I was getting before. And I am not having to work nearly so hard. Can sustain the dancing for maybe a minute or so.

Next step is to get it to dance all over. Said to be a useful aid to control and to meditation as well as to making wishes.

A relative of the singing bowl. See http://www.frankperry.co.uk/Singing%20Bowls.htm for the full story. Or perhaps http://www.bodhisattva.com/singing_bowl_history.htm.

 

Bubbles (1)

A dancing water bowl. 15 inches in diameter. From Eastwind of Cambridge.

 

Day of the chicken

Continuing to take advantage of the very advantageous pricing of chickens at the moment. BH is getting 5lb chickens for £5 on a regular basis. Which provides 2 meals for three people plus soup or stew. Not only do big chickens taste better than small ones but they are also much better value than anything on offer at Cheam. Just as well for them that one can get tired of chicken.

So yesterday the stock from the most recent 5lb chicken was turned into a wet stew with a tenderloin and a half, two onions, two green peppers (large), mushrooms and orange lentils. Stock simmered for maybe 3 hours, stew 2 hours.

This was followed up by a cheesecake, the sort of cheesecake which involves pastry and cooking. Not to mention cottage cheese and sour cream. Fairly bland in taste and very filling, but good texture and very good overall. Far superior to the things you tend to get in shops made with jello and digestive biscuits. Why is there no market for proper cheesecake? All that food flannel, all those billions of cook books, all those millions of viewing years of reality cooking TV - and still no cheesecake.

Now finished the Troyat biography of Tolstoy, first reported on 12 September. Sufficiently impressed to order up my very own hardback copy - the one I had borrowed being a rather battered Pelican biography in paperback - from Abebooks. The hardback turns out to be a perfectly serviceable hardback from the late sixties. Made by Longman in the days when hardbacks were real books with pages sewn in signatures, which open properly and which stay open without having to balance a plate on top, not just glue bound blocks of paper with hard covers replacing the soft covers. And it has more pictures than the Pelican version.

The mystery of where all the detail came from has been solved. I now know that both Tolstoy and his wife were long term diarists, committing their innermost thoughts - the sort of stuff most of us would hesitate to tell an analyst never mind a social worker - to paper for reciprocal reading. One of many odd aspects of an odd - but long lived - marriage. I think that all these diaries are now lovingly preserved for public access in some Tolstoy museum or other. Maybe they form part of the 90 volume collected works? It is going to need something to whack it up that far given that the sort of stuff read in this country would probably fit in 9.

I also now know that Tolstoy was a very strange bird as well as being a very great novelist. Largely self taught with all kinds of strange ideas about all kinds of things. A great hypocrite who disapproved of all kinds of things into which he was big himself. So, for example, a big voice for the downtrodden peasants - while not freeing his own serfs until the Tsar did it for him at emancipation. A big exposer of the rottenness of the old regime and many of its works. Big into communitarianism, vegetarianism and other non-violent ideals. The evil of money. The evil of money grubbing merchants buying up great chunks of the country from the aristos.. All of which brought him lots of devoted disciples and a correspondence with Mahatma Gandhi who was banging some of the same drums.

Ideals which rather marred some of his books. So surprised to find that his late story 'Hadji Marad' was pleasantly free of preaching, while being both a good story and good commentary on the times. A story which retained much sympathy for the romance of the Caucasian bandits who continue to plague the Russians to this day. Despite his ideals of non-violence. Now returned to 'Anna Karenina'. Where I observe much more honesty about sexual matters than most of the contemporary English greats manage. Which last don't seem to get much beyond the unwanted children of seduced working girls. But without (Tolstoy) needing to get into the sort of gory details which many modern writers seem to think are necessary. A decent reticence - both as regards gory details and preaching - while saying enough to make the point. A trick he had forgotten by the time he got to 'The Kreutzer Sonata'.

PS: maybe the people at BT Broadband are listening in. Prompted to take an important upgrade today. After which no longer sure that a bit of the help system was missing, as reported yesterday. Maybe I was just abusing it.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

 

An Arthurian romance

Down at TB heard a nice arthurian romance yesterday.

Down in Brighton, when Arthur was maybe 10 or 11, maybe in the late forties, he came across a young jackdaw being bashed about by a cat. Arthur rescues jackdaw and nurses it back to health, feeding it chopped up worms and such like. No milk. Names the jackdaw Joey. Joey is given a place to live in the shed and takes to riding about on Arthur's shoulder. For example, on the way to school. He responds to Arthur's whistle and likes to nibble his ears in a playful way. Arthur's dad not to pleased to have a jackdaw living in his shed but there he was. This goes on for about a year.

Then one day, Joey flies off the shoulder on arrival at school and is not seen again. Arthur distraught. Has dad done away with him? Then, about a month later, Arthur is in the kitchen with his mum and a couple of jackdaws come and sit on the edge of the shed roof. I wonder if that is Joey? Shouldn't think so, says mum. But Arthur tries his special whistle and one of the jackdaws flies down and sits on his shoulder. It really is Joey, come back to introduce his lady friend to his benefactor.

After that, Joey and his lady friend fly off to raise their family. Never to be seen again. But Arthur is happy that he has been able to say goodbye.

We also have some nature news from nearer home. The white autumn cyclamen have almost finished flowering at the bottom of the garden and the leaves are starting to show. Got maybe half a dozen small corms seeded off big daddy now. The jelly lichen has reappeared on the patio with the autumn damp. Mainly the sage green variety but a bit of the dark as well. Scores of green slugs of various sizes clustered underneath the lid of the compost bin. Breeding time or just a festival of some sort? And something has taken to depositing empty horse chestnut shells on the back lawn, sometimes in a line. Presumably they are being fetched by a squirrel with mathematical tendencies who regards the back lawn as his larder. A bit of a palaver as there are no chestnut trees in the immediate vicinity. Just oak, beech, willow and ash. Plus an odd walnut.

PS: broadband a bit shaky today, despite all the proper lights on the router being on and steady. First time there has been a problem which was not signalled by router lights anomalies. Took a reboot and BT Broadband Help being poked by Internet Explorer (I usually use Chrome) to get things going again. Going into BT Broadband Help direct does not seem to work at the moment. Looks as if a chunk of it is missing, not that I have done anything.

Monday, September 27, 2010

 

Family history (3)

Was this my first ever residence in this world? With thanks to http://www.mysuffolkfamily.com/postcards3.html

 

Family history (2)

Being in the area, thought to do a bit of poking around in the natal roots.

Started off easily enough by visiting Crescent Road, the house of the previous post. As it happened the occupant came to the door while we were peering. Pleasant enough but did not invite us in for tea and biscuits and an inspection of the interior. Remembered nothing of the outside - was only there for a couple of years or so - but it is possible that I would have remembered something of the inside. A butler sink, the bottom of the staircase, the pattern of the tiles. But this was not to be.

Quick tour round the general area. Church at end of the street where I might have been baptised had the parents been that way inclined which they were not. Shopping street a bit further away now very cosmopolitan. Plenty of shops selling food from far away places. Plenty of restaurants and fast food joints ditto. A tatoo parlour. A shop selling loudspeakers for loud cars. I dare say there were butchers, bakers and greengocers when I lived in the area but little sign of them now.

Next move was Felixstowe, where I was born, I thought in some sort of a small hospital. Had not thought to check my birth certificate at this point but did not think there would be all that much choice. After a bit found the Felixstowe Community Hospital, a place of about the right size and which looked to have been built 111 years ago, or so. Could easily have been the place but the lady behind the desk denied that it had ever been a maternity unit. Could have gone to the local library at this point, where there might well have been a local history enthusiast, but didn't.

Now the landlord of the Lord Nelson in Ipswich, a Felixtovian of 25 years standing despite coming from up north, thought that the most likely place was a dying hospital overlooking the sea. He also sold Adnams out of wooden barrels from behind the bar. Very civilised.

So at this point of Felixstowe, we came across a 'Convalescent Hill'. Maybe this leads to the place he was talking about. Not the place we had just been to. And after a while we come up against a drive with a blue NHS sign on it. Shabby looking lodge which might be for drug dependence. Up the drive to find a large and impressive building shut up behind a chain link fence. The Bartlett Convalescent Home. As luck would have it, a very helpful security guard let us in for a quick peek outside, despite the fact that the Suffolk Constabulary were inside having some firearms training. There was even the odd bang. Building looked as if it was from between the wars, complete with an sheltered area on the sea side for sunning onself. One could either recline in a one of a series of brick shelters built into the hill or on the small esplanade. Was it really a TB sanitorium?

Security guard really helpful chap. Formerly a long service man in the USAF, mainly Bentwaters. Married an Ipswich girl and stayed. Manages to get home to Florida every couple of years or so where he has more family.

Felixstowe beach was good. Fine view of the Bartlett, up behind the beach huts. There were even some people swimming although we had not thought to bring swimming togs.

So we have two places from which I might have emerged. Maybe emerged from the first and because I think I was difficult from birth, maybe transferred to the second for R&R. Back home, dig up the birth certificate. Where in florid but legible handwriting it says that I was born at 17 Beach Road East, maybe a couple of hundred yards from the Bartlett. Which as far as I can make out from Google Streeview is a street full of seaside villas. Maybe from 1900 or so. Mainly red brick. Maybe No. 17 was a B&B at the time, at which my father was putting up for the duration? Certainly never lived there on a permanent basis. And BH tells me that fathers, in the heat of the moment, quite often put down their address rather than the address of the birth. I don't suppose we will ever know. But we will pay a visit to No. 17 should we ever be in the vicinity again.

 

Family history (1)

The large semi in Ipswich where my parents lived at the time of my birth. Also two siblings. Also a lodger.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

 

Senior moment time again

In a park in Woodbridge, part from there being a large and impressive copper beech in one corner, there was something called an equatorial sundial in another. Which consisted of a spike which I decided was pointing at the Pole Star with a cylindrical ring around it. The cylindrical ring carried hour markings on its inner surface, and the shadow did indeed mark the right spot according to my mobile phone. There were a couple of screws for making minor adjustments to the orientation of the spike according to the time of year.

So far, so good. But then I got to wondering how an equatorial mount for a telescope worked, something which I thought I ought to know. I got as far as thinking that there must be a spike pointing at the Pole Star and that that the spike was one of the axes of rotation - the point being that in the days before computers, a constant speed motor on that axis would enable the telescope to keep up with a star as it sailed through the night sky. Much more tricky with other sorts of mount. But I completely failed to work out how the rest of the thing worked with paper and pencil. And it took several minutes with internet stepped motion pictures of such a telescope being moved into position before I cracked it. When it all seems terribly straightforward again. But for how long?

A test of my new-found understanding would be to find out whether people who sell you telescope mounts ask you where you live. Because I think the mounting angle will vary with latitude and a mount which would do for Madrid would not do for Oslo. A test which I think I pass as I have now found a helpful picture of a mount which is clearly adjustable for latitude.

The area around Woodbridge was well supplied with churches. Most of the proper ones has square towers faced with dressed flint but finished with stone. And very fancy decorative work involving both the black flint and the white stone to the top of the towers, around door openings and such like. Clearly the subject for inter-village rivalry. It rather reminded me of the vaguely contemporary black and white work we saw on the entry facades of some of the flashier churches in Florence.

One of them, East Bergholt, does not have a tower, the good citizens perhaps having run out of money at the vital moment. Or ravaged by the French. Quite a fancy place in other regards. And in the absence of a tower, the five bells were hung in a special square shed in the church yard, apparently very old, and one of a fairly small number of such things. I have never seen one before. Assuming, that is, that hanging is the right word. The bells were mounted mouth up rather than mouth down.

Two of them, St Margaret's in Ipswich and St Mary's in Woolpit, had very flashy double hammer beam roofs to their naves. The panels in the roof of the first were also painted, reminding me again of the trompe l'oeil effects we had come across in church roofs in Florence. Is it a coincidence that both towns prospered on the wool trade? Maybe there were low country merchants who visited both?

Quite keen on St Mary in Ipswich as they had St Mary Elm, St Mary Stoke, St Mary Quay and a St Mary Tower. Plus other St Marys which we did not come across. The first of these boasted the distinctions of having the oldest door in the county and of having been fired by vandals. Fair amount of damage done, quite recently as it still smelt. The second, across the water from Ipswich proper, boasted an excellent fish and chip shop nearby. Run by a Chinese gent. with a white youth doing front of shop. Cod and chips for BH, pie and chips for me. For the consumption of which we occupied the only bench in the vicinity, thus blocking the way for a hoodie with tinnie who clearly thought he had proprietorial rights and who sulked nearby with his fag while we ate. The last, St Mary Tower, was most impressive as a church. Much the most holy atmosphere, much helped by the stained glass. The pictures on the site noted below do not do it justice; perhaps the light was all wrong when they took them and all right when we visited.

If you can't make it there in person, read all about it at http://www.suffolkchurches.co.uk/.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

 

The hunt for an amplifier

My reasonably old Sony amplifier recently started to behave a bit erratically, doing odd things if one moved the volume control carelessly or tapped the top of the casing. Decided that it was time to do something about it.

First thought was to visit the second hand amplifier shop in Fife Road, Kingston whose proprietor had previously told me that he could do me something for £100 or so. Arrive at Fife Road all full of beans to find out that he has shut up shop; a pity as he would have been happy to talk to me about my modest requirements in language I could understand. No talk of sub-woofers or super-wafters. Can't think of anywhere else of that sort in the vicinity so reduced to new.

First port of call John Lewis, which is splendid for laptops and televisions but does little or anything in the way of free standing amplifiers. Clearly the fashion for free standing has waned, not worth their while any more.

Second port of call Sevenoaks Sound, where I learn that I could spend vastly more than I had in mind. An assistant offers me their bottom of the range offering, a Marantz PM6003 Amplifier for £249. Start to get used to the idea that I am going to have to spend a bit more than £100. But I havn't got a clue what a Marantz is, so I decide to go home and think about it. Maybe ask Mr G. what he thinks.

Third port of call Audio-T, where I am taken in hand by a smooth and helpful salesman who is not in the least put out by my observing that I appear to be in the wrong shop, a shop intended for people who spend more on their hifi than I spend on my car - that is to say tens of thousands. Looks very sad when I explain that my elderly Tannoys are not a matched pair but he does recognise the Pro-Ject Debut turntable which it turned out I had bought from Sevonoaks Sound some years ago for the princely sum of £109 and which has done very well. He could also sell me one from the same gang but which costs considerably more. Arranges for me to come in for a demonstration of his bottom of the range offering in the amplifier department, a Rega Brio for £328.95. Looks a lot neater and smarter than the Marantz. Also not as deep and would actually fit sensibly on the surface intended which is only 11 inches deep. My budget is gradually easing up.

Go home to check out Rega with Mr G. who tells me that the Rega Brio is a really spiffing value entry level amplifier. So far so good. So off to the demonstration armed with some select discs. Including the Haydn Op. 20 No. 1 quartet which I have recently become very fond of. Slight hum to be heard because their Pro-Ject turntable needs an earth, like mine, and the Rega Brio does not oblige. But not to worry. Sir can have a phono box which will sort that out. Which it does. Sound terrific. Can we try unmatched speakers to see how bad that is? Certainly sir. I am not sure that I can tell the difference. Salesman looks very sad again. If sir can't tell the difference then he might as well stick with his ancient unmatched Tannoys. Wouldn't do for me though, looked but not said. Decide not to be bounced into instant sale and ask from a shopping list which has now moved from £328.95 to £484.81. Hopefully including VAT.

Ponder awhile and decide that this is rather a lot. Decide to take a peek at Ebay, something which I do not do very often and requires me to go and look up what name I am registered under. Zillions of amplifiers on offer. But how on earth to choose? I haven't got a clue. But then I come across a helpful gent. selling something called an Ariston AX-910 with a starting price of £15 with auction expiring in about 4 hours. Quick consultation with Mr G. who tells me that this is a reasonably ancient bit of kit but which was considered a perfectly decent entry level amplifier in its day. Put a bid in and the thing is mine for £17.73 plus £14 postage.

Large parcel arrives a few days later. Amplifier plugged in. Loudspeaker cables tidied up. Sound fine but not much volume. Trundle down to Maplins to buy 4 banana plugs (a bit of jargon I had picked up from Audio-T) to make a proper connection between the loudspeakers and the amplifier. This sets me back £8.36 - half what I had paid for an entire amplifier. These are now installed and there does seem to be more volume. Quite enough for my purposes anyway. And sound better, I think, than that it replaced. Lot more crackle from ancient discs now audible being the down side.

But all in all, not unhappy with the outcome. Retromainia get £31.73 and the audio outfits who are not in my league lose out. At least for now.

Friday, September 24, 2010

 

Hotel inspector

Can now indulge in a bit of hot off the motorway comparison between the Novotel at Ipswich and the Best Western at Cambridge.

Similar offerings in that they are both on the southern edge of the town centre of a town boasting a lot of old buildings. We had large comfortable rooms in both. Both had free computing in the foyer, not much used which meant that I could have a go. Presumably most people who want access carry laptops. Both had a plentiful supply of hot and cold water.

Plus points for the Novotel, smart modern building and good breakfast. Minus point the bath. All as previously mentioned. Plus points for the Best Western, large sensible bath and a smoking area which took the form of an old walled garden. Lawn, big trees, full moon. Plenty of suitable garden furniture. But oddly unused. Perhaps people don't puff in Cambridge. Minus points for the Best Western, good deal dearer than the Novotel. But their biggest black was their kipper. Knowing that these can be a bit dodgy in hotels, made a point of asking the waitress whether the kipper came with head and tail, failing that with some bones. She assured me that head and tail were missing but bones were present. OK, go for the kipper. When it turned up, it turned out to be one of those deodorized shrink wrap affairs. Small soggy fillets with no bones and swimming in oil and butter. Sprig of parsley. I remonstrated with the waitress. Well, she said. This is what we call a kipper here. Bit of a cheek considering it formed part of their de-luxe breakfast offering.

Next day tried their traditional English (small). Said to be cooked to order. Which included an over cooked and over spiced sausage and some sort of potato wedges which had clearly been cooked the previous day and warmed up for my delectation. On the whole, Novotel had done rather better with their hot buffet version - although the Best Western scrambled eggs were not quite as palid as the Novetel ones. Different brand of egg powder? In both places what was described as a fried egg looked as if it had been poached in warm vegetable oil. Flabby, shiny white things. Not much like the hot lard fried job at all. To end on a good note, both used quite decent bacon. Much better than the stuff you are apt to get from Mr S..

PS: pity about the Labour Party - when the offering seems to be one of two brothers. Not been following their election closely enough to tell them apart, although one of them seems to have got into a bit of a twist about torturing people suspected of terrorism. Which one though? I think there ought to be a self-denying ordinance whereby if somebody is active politically, their children, parents, siblings and partners are all disqualified from being active at the same level. Far too many relations floating about the upper reaches of the Labour Party. Gives off a bad smell. (I have inherited prejudice in these matters from my teacher mother who hated having married couples in the staff room. Always forming cliques).


 

Decorating your cupboards

We were amused by a rich Jacobean's idea of cupboard decoration which we came across in Christchurch Mansion in Ipswich. Might be thought a touch tacky these days, but as it is, an important historical document. Possibly Ole King Cole.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

 

Mammoths

Yesterday to Ipswich museum, a large and impressive relic of a by-gone era. Lots of things in glass fronted mahogany boxes.

Main hall, just inside the front door, a large affair with a first floor gallery running around the walls and mainly full of stuffed animals. So we had a mammoth, presumably not stuffed, a giraffe, a lion with cubs (notice explaining the cubs were neo-natal zoo deaths, not wild), a bear, a gorilla and sundry less important animals. Beavers, ant eaters and so on. Various skulls, teeth and other relics. An area with various sea life, including the first horse shoe crab that I have ever seen close up, this one about a foot long. Behind this gallery what was described as one of the largest collections of stuffed birds extant. There were certainly a lot of them and they all looked a bit dusty.

Animal life all good fun but a bit old-speak. One got the impression that the curators were a touch embarassed by the whole business.

Then there was an Anglo Saxon gallery, complementing the previous day's visit to Sutton Hoo. Much more modern affair than the animals with a proper collection of posters explaining what was going on. Good balance between poster and artefact. A gallery of man-kind with all sorts of things from around the world. All in all it has been a week for masks. What with the masked helmet being sold at Christies, the masked helmet dug up at Sutton Hoo and now all these masks from Africa and other places. Clearly wearing masks for masques was an important business in the olden days. A slavery gallery to provide a bit of balance. A second world war room. An Egyptian gallery with quite a lot of stuff on loan from the British Museum. Where I learned that not only did the Egyptians put their innards into canopic jars, they also had particular jars for particular innards. So one jar was the god of intestines and was used for intestines, another was the god of stomachs and used for stomachs. Not very big, maybe 9 inches high. Distinguished by the lids of the jars being in the form of the appropriate god's head. And then, rather than go to the waste and expense of burying one's servants with one, one buried model servants in a special model servant box. It seems that when someone said the proper spell, these models would spring into life as real live servants who could serve one's underworld breakfast. Not sure who told the spell. Perhaps one had to rely on the priests who were still in the land of the living keeping up the proper prayers for the proper length of time.

First floor gallery a little disappointing in that the proportion of poster to artefact got a bit high. One might just as well have read a picture book about Ipswich.

A good morning out, and free. But one wonders how such an old-fashioned place will survive in the new world of outsourced Suffolk. We read in our papers that they plan to more or less close down the Suffolk operation and replace the fraction they can still afford by contractors. Do they hand over the museum to Chessington World of Adventures to run for them, prior to closing it down and flogging the site off? Would the National Trust be interested?

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

 

Sutton Hoo

Bit of public archeology yesterday, courtesy of the National Trust. Where they manage to put on a good show despite the burial mounds themselves not being that impressive. I imagine they would have been more so when raw and new, perhaps at a time when the landscape was less obscured by trees and bushes.

Shiny new exhibition and cafeteria halls. Exhibition hall has lots of educational panels, a sprinking of artefacts and some interesting reconstructions. I was very impressed by the sword, the construction of which was very complicated. A core and two edges. The core made in a long process of folding alternate layers of mild and hard steel, twisting the resultant bars into ropes and lastly welding two such ropes together to make the core. How on earth did such a process evolve? How much status did the smiths have? More or less priestly? What relation did this process bear to the Damascus proces of damascening sword baldes, also very strong and up for slicing through the rather thin armour available in those days. There was also very elaborate decorative metal work on a small scale - clasps and buckles and such like. Impressed also by the material poverty of the big cheeses of that time. They might have had some very fancy toys but that was about it. After that onto wives, slaves and other livestock.

Site rounded out by a couple of excellent circular walks, mainly through woodland. Some large trees, mainly sweet chestnut, and the largest ash tree I have seen since our visit to Cadbury castle. Views of the Deben, from where the funeral ships had been dragged.

Plus a nice bit of chain saw art of Spot the magic dragon. Whoever did it played to the tree as he found it, rather than playing with his chain saw. Far better than the stuff you get in Surrey.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

 

Ipswich regained

The mystery to the proper bread in Novotel has been solved. When logging out I noticed that the Apple was talking to me in French and the reception people informed me that Novotel was indeed a French outfit. Presumably all their IT is piped through their HQ, somewhere in France.

But they have put up a black. I discover this morning that I cannot escape Coronation Street by having a bath. They have thoughtfully piped the sound from the television into the bathroom. On the other hand they did see fit to pipe up the toilet in the same way...

Yesterday evening we discovered where the brightest and best in Ipswich spend their evenings when we wandered along the northern shore of what used to be the wet dock and is now the marina. Pots of flashy looking boats with a sprinkling of older boats, some actually made out of wood, and including a handful of Thames (maybe Orwell?) barges which looked as if they were in working order. One, which did not look as if it has been health and safetied for passengers, appeared to be offering trips, but they were bird flavoured and did not kick off until November so we did not pursue the matter.

Took refreshment in Isaac's. A collection of ancient dockside sheds which had been very expensively and tastefully converted into a day & night spot. One which the National Trust would be proud of and which packs in upwards of 700 revellers on Friday and Saturday nights. Good quality heaters in the various smoking dens. Average quality Greene King IPA - but at least they had it. I dare say most of the clientele was into cold and fizzy. There was also a place to get married.

Kept going past all the bistros until we came to the boundary between the marina and what was left of the proper dock. A spinkling of real boats. Cranes and warehouses. Also a poky little dockside pub, tucked behind some warehouses, which we thought would be full of superannuated soaks and worse but which turned out to be a newly opened Chinese restaurant. It had retained the name, 'The Golden Ship'. Interesting meal, if the brand new staff a bit self conscious and over attentive in a not very busy restaurant. I would be just the same, if not worse, in the same circumstances.

Monday, September 20, 2010

 

Novotel

This from the Novotel at Ipswich. Which distinguishes itself by being the first hotel in ages to supply decent French-like bread sticks (between flute an baguette in size) for breakfast and the first hotel in England to have free Internet in the lobby. This last in the form of a large and flashy Apple. As big as our telly at home. The first free Internet ever was in Paris. But there we had to go out to the cafe for breakfast - breakfast room underground and cramped. To mix it with people who were still allowed to puff over their croissants.

Room nicely got up. Posh telly positioned so that you can use it from a small sofa without having to go to bed. It may even show ITV3. Separate toilet and bathrom. Another hotel first. Separate shower and bath in the bathroom. Yet aother first. Interesting sink, with the bowl of roughly cylindrical rather than spherical shape. Interesting plumbing, which takes a while to get the hang of. Bath itself rather small with the very trendy plughole located just about where one might otherwise want to sit down.

Off to explore Ipswich!

Sunday, September 19, 2010

 

Wondering about Wendy

Some years ago we had a plump blonde barmaid at TB called Wendy. I know of at least two gentlemen who were fascinated by her generous curves. Recently another Wendy appeared, same sort of chassis but with much reduced circumference. Hair possibly dyed. Which caused us to wonder about the rarity of the name. I used to work with one. FIL had one for a neighbour in Exminster. Then there are the hamburger places. There used to be one near the Marble Arch Odeon and the company appears to be alive and well at http://www.wendys.com/ but I cannot remember when I last came across one of them. Peter Pan was fond of a Wendy. And that exhausts my store of wendys. Perhaps there was a spurt of them from the generation of mothers brought up on Peter Pan and then that was that.

Which brings me onto another matter of name, the people who do not like their given name. Of whom I know of three. An Arthur, a Rupert and a Charmaine. Not liking to the point that they do not look up if you call them by that name. Totally submerged under their known-as name. Charmaine was impressed by the notion of a known-as box on forms you have to fill in. Avoids embarrassment when visiting doctors and the like. Or when dealing with the terrorist conscious people behind desks at airports who get quite excited if they come across two first names for the same person. Apt to smell a very big rat.

Pigeons busy this morning on the fire thorn. As many as four of them on it at one point, which looked rather odd it not being a very big bush and their being quite big birds. Quite a lot of swaying.

 

Helmet

I was oddly disappointed to read somewhere that this strange and wonderful helmet was found in 67 pieces, this confirmed by Wikipedia which talks of 33 large pieces and 34 small pieces. Also oddly, the blurb at http://www.christies.com suggests that the thing was found more or less in one piece. Sellers privilege perhaps. Must go and take a look at the thing at Christies before it vanishes.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

 

Cape cod

Yesterday being both a Friday and one of the days of the first papal state visit since the reformation of the church all those hundreds of years ago, it was doubly appropriate to have baked cod for lunch. At least I think it is the first state visit; the royal web site not being specific on the point although the papal visit of 1982 does not appear to qualify. And although the papal web site covering the 1982 visit is overloaded and unavailable in Epsom, its index entry does suggest that that visit was actually the first ever visit of a pope to the UK, never mind the reformation. Another index entry suggests that there has only ever been one papal visit to the more extensive flock in Ireland.

Sadly, the cod not quite up to the standard of the past few weeks. This may be something to do with the Hastings cod sometimes being caught in a trawl, which means they usually land in the boat alive, and sometimes being caught in a sort of stationary drift net, which often means that they land in the boat dead. This last not being good for flavour. Or so the fish man was telling me yesterday. But quite edible.

After a short siesta, off to Vauxhall to catch the Pope between Lambeth Palace and Westminster Palace. Slight downer at Vauxhall Station where there were sundry police and where the eastern exit had been shut for crowd control purposes. But these measures were nothing to do with the Pope, rather something to do with cricket at the Oval. Never mind, onto Lambeth Bridge where the crowd was not too thick and took up station at the railings.

The scene was enlivened by large numbers of regular police men, smaller numbers of irregular police men (some armed), a police boat, an RNLI flat boat, various helicopters (provenance unknown) and quite a lot of police vehicles. Plus, of course, the faithful and the curious. Quite a lot of the faithful had yellow and white papal flags and some of them were dressed in yellow and white. No sign of St John ambulance.

While we were waiting we learned. That the papal throne used in Twickenham appeared to be of wooden construction with a red and gold loose cover. The sort of cover than you or I might have on our sofa. Very democratic. That there are lots of Catholic archbishops - maybe 20 or so covering the UK compared to the very much smaller number of Anglican archbishops. Clearly a different sort of set-up. Which extends to the Archbishop of Westminster not being the primate ex-officio. Usually but not always. That there are not enough good quality Catholic schools. See http://www.cts-online.org.uk/.

As the big moment approached, the police men on motorbikes had a few practise swings across the bridge. As did some large cars, filled with what looked like securoplebs if not securocrats. And then, after a while, we had a couple of coaches filled with cardinals, waving peacefully to the crowds. And then, the popemobile itself. With a rather motley collection of cars before and behind. Perfectly decent cars but not matching. Not your motorcade of black Mercedes or anything like that. Ambulance brought up the rear.

It may have been a coincidence, but the chief fire boat chose this moment to do a display with its power hoses.

And so the Pope went off to address various important people including Pastmasters Brown, Blair and Major and Postmistress Thatcher. I understand that as one of the elect, Pastmaster Blair was honoured by being allowed to kiss the papal signet. Not sure about Cherry. His Holiness might have had enough after shaking hands with a senior lady priest, something he is very clear about not approving of.

Various important policemen updated whatever it was they had on their important clipboards. And we wandered off to the 'Black Dog' where trade was much better than it used to be, if rather noisy. Amused there by what seemed to be the large number of fancy cars being driven past, mostly by young black men. Plus one elderly roller.

 

Bad picture

Men in black just about visible on the top of the Tradescant Tower on the occasion of the state visit of His Holiness the Pope. Time: waiting for the cardinals' charabanc (hired from The Kings Ferry, see http://www.thekingsferry.co.uk/) to emerge. Policeman from Bromley. Outrage! protest hidden down among the trees. Elderly Nokia not really up to shots of this sort.

Friday, September 17, 2010

 

Abstracting earth

Before earth, I report an odd glitch. That is to say that the image in the last post loaded wrong first time around. That is to say that it looked OK on my PC but when it was loaded the bottom half had been displaced relative to the top half by half a centimetre or so. Somehow the image had been corrupted in transit. The sort of thing which is not supposed to happen in the digital world. First thought was that perhaps it was something to do with the format generated at my end not being quite what the other end was expecting, different version of the format or something, but this thought binned when the thing loaded OK on the second attempt.

Yesterday decided to go in for a spot of gardening for once in a while, to fill in the hole in the bit of back lawn which was first home to a Christmas tree, then to a plum tree and latterly to some not very vigorous acanthus. For which purpose we needed some soil. Now despite having a reasonable sized garden (although one of the smaller around here), there was nowhere where I wanted to dig a barrow load of earth from. First thought was to go and buy some soil from our local garden centre. Second thought was that this was likely to be three or four pounds a bag and I might need three or four of them. Not impressed. Had I seen a skip recently with something suitable? No. Next stop was the site of West Park Hospital, about to be redeveloped. Surely I could find something in their extensive and run-down grounds? Well, no. Partly because the demolition people had arrived and we were a bit coy about poking about under their noses. Next stop was the car park of Horton Country Park. Here we struck gold, there being some small heaps of rough top soil dumped there. Shovelled up a couple of bags, keeping an eye out for roving trusties. I would not like to abstract earth from Epsom Common, however it might of got there, the Common being a sort of Nature Preserve. But earth which looked as if it had been dumped by someone else on the Country Park was fair game. But which did not stop us being a bit furtive about it.

Back home to start preparing the hole. Starting by removing the stump of the plum tree, executed some years ago. Few blows with the trusty mattock and the job was done and I was puffing a bit. A mattock primarily intended for the demolition of buildings rather than trees, sourced from an old fashioned hardware store which used to be opposite the Surbiton Angling Centre. Now deceased. Next step dig out most of the acanthus roots. Next step sieve the abstracted earth into the hole. The first outing for my father's gardening sieve for many years. The earth was indeed a bit rough with there being plenty of stone, road and otherwise, odd bits of root, glass, plastic and metal. One and a half bags did the job. Although when we get into tamping down I dare say we will need the other half bag. More or less covered the hole with a scrap of chicken wire - my serious supplies had been left to my successor at the allotment - to keep the foxes off. So far, successfully.

About to enter into convocation with FIL about the best way to turn the filled hole into lawn. We will see how we get on.

All this while pondering about the difficulty we have admitting fault. Partly because, in the context of work, admitting fault can often be read and exploited as a sign of weakness. Personal trainers are apt to tell one not to do it. But a silly world where respected public and former public servants can assert that there has been no fault. So to my mind it is foolish for the boss of HMCR to claim that his staff have not made mistakes - this in the context of the recovery of unpaid tax. In large clerical operations there are always mistakes. Fact of life. And foolish for the witch hunted former boss of child care in Harringey to deny that she made any mistakes. Again, she operated in a complicated world and I do not believe that there were not things that she might have done differently with the benefit of hindsight. In the vernacular, mistakes.

Perhaps we could teach these people a bit more humility by making them do a bit of computer programming. Computer programmers know that they will always make mistakes, that to err is human, and so go in for elaborate procedures to find them out. There is no shame in making the mistake. The shame lies in not tracking it down. The point here being that the mistakes are usually quite unambiguous. No ifs and buts. The line of code is simply wrong, in the way that a spelling mistake is wrong, and needs to be corrected. One cannot pretend one has not made a mistake. Sometimes, sadly, it might be rather more than a wrong line. The whole concept might be flawed - but that is another story.

 

Resting places

Would my younger brother have been amused to think that his last resting place would get to be advertised in this way? Also a place, as it happens, where I used to go to look at stars when in my astronomical phase. The darkest place in the vicinity.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

 

Global warming

Given that our consumption of cows is a big contributor to global warming, not impressed that Lady G. chooses to consume her cow by wearing it. Very wasteful and one might have thought not very comfortable or hygienic. Poor old cow (or perhaps cows from more than one country), gone through all the unpleasantness of the slaughter-house to wind up draped around the posterior of a poppess. Not something people have made a habit of since Aztec warriors used to dress up in the skins of illegal immigrants who had been sacrificed to Quetzalcoatl.

Retaliated yesterday with a couple of fore ribs. By way of an experiment cooked them at 190C instead of the usual 180C. Impressed with the result - which was served with the first savoy of the season, some of those miniature corn cobs - presumably air freighted from Thailand, thus warming up the globe even more - and white rice. All very splendid although it left me feeling rather full for the rest of the day.

Over the washing up it dawned on us why another dish we have - meat loaf made with lamb mince - works so well. As well as costing maybe a fifth of what fore rib costs. We read on the packet that the stuff is 20% fat. A good proportion of which is going to leach out during cooking leaving the loaf full of voids. Spongy even. We thought that this was what gave the loaf its pleasing lightness. And an explanation of why beef burgers made out of lean meat often have an unpleasing heaviness.

Moving on from the kitchen, later that day I came across a small paper carrier bag lying in the road. A sturdy white bag, the sort of bag you might get from a posh shop selling small items and which some ladies like to use to discretely advertise the shopping habits that they do not have. This one turned out to be from Carphone Warehouse and so not much use for that sort of purpose at all. But I did get to wondering how you made a flat packed bag from under the counter into a box shaped bag suitable for putting small items in. How do I reverse fold the thing back to flat pack? Took me 57 seconds to work it out.

Having sorted that one out, fell to wondering about the article about Peruvian asparagus in 'The Guardian' of the day. About how the Peruvians, at the behest of the World Bank, are growing hundreds of millions of pounds worth of asparagus to be air freighted to the UK. With the catch being that this involves sucking an awful lot of water out of the ground making life rather difficult for other people living in the desert where the asparagus is grown. Plus, of course, lots of global warming.

Poking around the net, I am now the proud owner of a whole sheaf of asparagus factlets. So the US promoted the asparagus industry in Peru so that the Peruvians would stop growing so much cocaine. That more than three quarters of the world's asparagus is grown in China but they do not care to export the stuff. They leave that to Peru, Mexico, the US and Spain, who grow much less but export much more. That the good people of the US consume about a pound English of the stuff each, every year. That some 1,500 English hectares are devoted to the growing of asparagus. Coded 171 by DEFRA. That, to quote: 'EUREP-GAP already certifies much of the vegetable sector, particularly in the EU. Even outside the EU some vegetable producers are realising the benefits of production according to EUREP-GAP standards. In Peru, for instance, asparagus is grown according to EUREP-GAP guidelines'. See http://www.globalgap.org. And now you know as much as I do.

PS: all of which prompts Mr G. to tell me where I can go to slim, of an outfit which will deliver well hung meat to my door, of another which will deliver pedigree Herefords (bulls, cows or heifers) to my door and lastly of one which can send me discount vouchers for the best restaurants in London.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

 

Advertisement

Can't show the pictures which came with yesterday's concert but I can show the blurb.

 

Double bill

A few days ago scored what I think might be a first for us. Went to see Tamara Drewe within days of its release, in a proper cinema. Rather than grabbing a senior session at the small & hard seated Epsom Playhouse, some months or years after the event. But no more punters in the Odeon than in the Playhouse, say less than a dozen. Hard to see how they make a crust at that rate. We could hardly have paid the staff costs never mind anything else. Film itself both good fun and with some good hot spots, if a little long and marred, for the BH anyway, by liberal use of the vernacular. Bit like a glossy version of Midsomer Murders. Some good swipes at best selling authors and writers' retreats - which might be why the TLS was a little po-faced in its praise. Bit too close to the bone.

Followed yesterday by a follow-up trip to Holy Trinity in Sloane Land (see August 25) where we heard an excellent young pianist, Gareth Owen, do some show off pieces on the piano, part of the Chelsea Schubert Festival. A Bach Partita transcribed by Rachmaninov. Late Schubert sonata, D958. Chopin Ballade, Op. 52. All sounded rather good - considering both that I had not heard any of it before and that I am not usually very keen on show off pieces - on a small grand, a Bluthner I think, with a very clear tone, well suited to the venue. BH observed that there were magical moments. Which indeed there were, some of which in my case were mixed up with the splendid east window.

The window is arranged in two parts. A relatively plain bottom half with 48 little panels containing saints. Then a relatively fancy top half, maybe in what the French would call the Flamboyant style. For the first two pieces we still had some light and I was struck how the designer of the glass had put a narrow clear border around each section, a wheeze which really brought out the tracery in this particular light. Deep black tracery against the glowing glass. A good balance between the tracery and the stained glass. An organic and balanced whole of which I think Pugin would have approved. See May 3rd. Excellent backdrop to the music.

Then the light faded and the window went dull. Just a flat end to the chancel. No life in it at all. The tracery stopped being part of a window and was reduced to being a bit of fluff spread across a bit of brown board across a hole in the wall. But then, as the Chopin picked up, it came back to life with the tracery giving the illusion that the window was not flat at all and the tracery was not that of a window but that of a complicated apse. Great sense of depth. A sense which faded between the Chopin and the encore, but came back, piano, during the encore.

After which came back to earth in the middle of a cloud burst in Sloane Square. Decided to forego a second round at 'The Antelope' and headed down into the tube station and onto Wimbledon. A convenient way home if one happens to be in west London.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

 

Up with the lark

Reached the baker at the unseemly hour of 0820 this morning, having to be elsewhere later in the morning. The ladies at the baker almost fell off their perches and when they recovered enquired very solicitously whether I enjoyed cycling with all the riff-raff about at that time of day. They themselves start work at 0730 and are more used to the early morning goings-on.

Quite nice to be up and about a bit earlier. Gets one going a bit. And a change to be back in serious traffic - although I am not sure I would want to do it too soon after a binge. Reactions might be a bit slow. Passed one cyclist who thought nothing of jumping onto the pavement so that he could skip a line of traffic, a practise I do not approve of. Pavement is for pedestrians and carriageway is for carriages. Nor do I approve of jumping lights, cycling the wrong way on one-way streets and other dodges of that sort. In fact, I am all for the police being able to pull cyclists for infringements of that sort and hauling them up before the beak for driving license endorsement - most cyclists will have one and will not want to have it endorsed. So it would be a deterrent.

But I do admit to sliding up more or less stationary lines of traffic, perhaps on the white line and perhaps with an inclination to nip in and out which can be a bit unnerving for car drivers. When I am driving in more or less stationary traffic on a motorway I often fail to notice a motor cycle until it has passed me.

I would also get rid of most of our more or less useless cycle lanes. Much more bother to use than they are worth. Not to mention all the unsightly road markings they need. And I would thin out all the islands in the middle of roads which can make it hard for powered vehicles to overtake one. Not enough room for cycle, reasonable gap, powered vehicle and island.

Now to breakfast where I shall re-read the DT piece on how we are going to lose our special place in the heart of the US if we cut our defence spending. Interesting graphic showing defence spending by the various big spending countries. On the basis that the DT has done its homework and that the figures are reasonable - at a guess it would take a fair amount of homework to produce figures of this sort on a comparable basis - I share some factlets.

So the US spends twice as much of its GDP on defence as most other people, that is to say 4%. And it spends 10 times as much absolutely as its nearest competitor - £450b to China's £46b. We come third with £37b. The bellicose French come seventh with £27b. Presumably it is these crude financial factlets which mean that the US is the only country in the world which is able, more or less at the nod of the president, to pack up an armoured brigade or two and send it across the sea on ships. Complete with escorting, nuclear tipped battle group. Good thing that we can trust the Yanks not to have a pop at us.

Remain unconvinced that we have any business trying to play in this league any more. We just have to wait until the UN or the EC get their act together and subscribe to that - and in the meantime to spend a lot less than we do now. Humanitarian aspirations to interfere in the affairs of others onto the back burner. Might be desirable but not affordable. And hope that the various rogue states do not get roguish enough to be able to bother us.

Monday, September 13, 2010

 

Sticks and stones will break my bones

But words will never hurt me. Or so the primary school playground jingle went. An early and important lesson in the difference between the sign and the signified. Or is it the sign and the signifier?

However, like all simple and pleasing truths not altogether true, on which account I return to the idiot with moustaches (see above). See also August 27.

In the western world, we like to pride ourselves on our freedom of speech. Everyone is free to express their opinions without fear of retribution, retaliation or the secret police (not thinking here of those hidden microphones they are putting in our wheelie bins).

But this freedom has to be qualified.

Suppose I insult someone with fighting spirit and he or she wallops me, perhaps breaking my jaw. If we suppose further that I knew that the subject of the insult was with fighting spirit, the insult becomes suicidal. I might be free to do it but the results will be untoward. Perhaps the courts, if I pressed charges, would apply a test of reasonable force. If I insult you, you can knock me down but if I insult your mother, you can break my jaw. But suppose, after a mild insult, I end up with a broken jaw, the jaw breaker ends up in jail, and the rest of you have to pay the considerable costs of these proceedings. The rest of you might get fed up with this and try to deal with the problem by making it illegal to insult people. Which might deter much insult. But would also interfere with normal social intercourse, in the course of which some socialites can both give and take a fair amount of aggressive banter, and deter much free speech. Both of which are, generally speaking, a good thing.

Another scenario might be that I live in the Netherlands and I insult the holy book of the Burmans. Many Burmans in Burma (aka Myanmar) get very angry and in the absence of any action by the Netherlands authorities to punish me or apologise decide to riot and burn down the Netherlands Embassy in Rangoon (aka Yangon pending a move to Naypyidaw). In the course of the riot 15 rioters, 4 policemen, 7 diplomats and 3 locally employed embassy servants get killed with other casualties proportionate. Of these, the 4 policemen, the 7 diplomats and the 3 locally employed embassy servants are reasonably innocent third parties, although all could be charged with aiding and abetting the insult and/or the insulter.

Here, I think, I see my way a bit more clearly. Both the rioters and I have caused death, in the sense that both our contributions were necessary, both were voluntary and the results were predictable. Both meet the Catholic test of mortal sin. So while I would not want to make it illegal to insult other peoples' holy books, I would want to have powers to come down on people who do where the consequences are or threaten to be untoward. So if we were at war with France, you are free to insult the French as much as you like. This stirs up patriotic feeling and is a good thing. I think there was a fair amount of this during both world wars. But if we at peace with France, you can only insult them in moderation. If our powers that be think you are becoming immoderate they can come down on you. Severe punishment for repeat offences. And apologies to the French on behalf of the country as a whole from Prime Minister Cameron, with full panoply of national penance. Prime Minister Blair might have sought absolution from the Pope in such circumstances.

The fullness of the Prime Ministerial apology would, of course, depend on how touchy we thought the French were being. A bit of banter between consenting adults ought to be OK. We might need to remind them of this from time to time. And if we thought that their touchiness was starting to infringe on our rights and liberties, we might feel the need to stand firm and take whatever consequences there might be.

National security is a very simple case. If we at war with Iceland and I know some secret, the divulgence of which to the Icelanders would result in more or less immediate loss of the war and national humiliation, I am not free to speak that secret. Any suggestion that I might speak that secret and the securocrats can weigh in. Normal law of the land suspended. Wherein lies another tale.

Another simple case would be telling untruths with malicious intent. So I am not free to tell someone the untruth that their house is ablaze and in imminent danger of collapse and that they had better jump out of the window, never mind it being three floors up. Now off to the baker, during which expedition I might think of a more realistic example. I am confident that I will.

In the meanwhile, it is also true that one is not free to tell an untruth by omission. So, for rather bizarre example, if I were a Palestinian Israeli and seduced a Jewish Israeli without mentioning that I was a Palestinian when I might reasonably have been supposed to have been a Jew, I might be convicted of some lesser species of rape. To be fair to the authorities concerned, the particular case reported did result from a plea bargain by a repeat offender of the ordinary sort. On the other hand, the reports did not say whether the laws in question were symmetrical.

In sum, entirely confident that the right to free speech cannot be absolute. Any more than any other rights can be. The difficult bit is working out how the qualification is going to work.

PS: Broadband tried to throw a wobbly yesterday. Was able to make a connection but was unable to hold it. Kept trying and trying. Until in exasperation I fired up the Broadband help desk which sits on the top of my desk and that scared the problem away without needing to do anything further. Been OK since. On the other hand, the mysterious Trusteer Rapport, some security widget courtesy, I hope, of HSBC is behaving mysteriously. Don't seem to be able to get at its advertised weekly report but it is sitting on the task bar trying to put green padlocks and https connections on the command line. A proceeding which seems to work with Google mail but not with Google blogs which is add as they are tied together to the extent of sharing a login procedure.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

 

Centenary

Collected two books on Friday from the unofficial libraries of Tooting.

The first was a short book written by Roy Jenkins about fifty years ago about the passage of the first Parliament Act about 100 years ago, in 1911. This being the act which makes it possible, if not easy, for the Commons to override the Lords. An interesting tale of the nuts and bolts of achieving almost revolutionary change without actually getting as far as revolutionary action.

It seems that for the second half of the 19th century the Tories had a large, antiquated and obstructive majority in the Lords which in the early part of the 20th century was being used to block Liberal reform measures, notably the Home Rule bill for Ireland but also Welsh Church Disestablishment, something else which raised the temperatures of the day. Being the party of the lords of the land, they were also very keen on putting tariffs on imported food, a measure which as well as increasing the price of grub to the toiling masses would have done wonders for their rent rolls.

After a torrid battle which Jenkins recounts in loving detail, in temperatures which apparently rose to 100F in parts of London, the Lords achieved what turned out to be a strategic retreat. That is to say, by agreeing to a cumbersome procedure by which they could be overruled by the Commons, they avoided being swamped by hundreds of new creations and they avoided reform of the upper house. Which last some Tories had thought to be the lesser evil and reform was discussed with more seriousness than New Labour managed near 100 years later. So they lived to fight another day and managed to block Home Rule until there really was a revolution.

I also learned that Mrs Asquith interfered in the affairs of her Prime Ministerial husband even more than our own Cherry or Bill's Hilary and that the battle resulted in a step down in the standards of political behaviour. The old-fashioned courtesy of the Commons of the turn of the century was cast into the dustbin of history.

The second was a much longer book about Tolstoy by Henri Troyat, whom I had thought French but was actually a Russian by birth. Not got very far yet, but he writes the biography with a most impressive knowledge of his subject. Or perhaps he has been filling in the gaps in the evidence available using his considerable skills as a novelist. I am surprised, but should not have been, to find that Prince Andrew's family (in 'War and Peace') was largely based on Tolstoy's own, even down to the names.

And reminded that Tolstoy's celebrated but obnoxious 'Kreutzer Sonata' was written at almost exactly the same time as 'The Picture of Dorian Gray'. Both, perhaps, a product of the unease which followed the abolition of the deity among the chattering classes. They had lost their rudder and had yet to find a new one. The search for which continues.

PS: good to read of a bit of old-fashioned civility in the 'Evening Standard' of the same day. To wit, a Russian company, out of the blue, offering to build and replace the ageing masts of HMS Belfast as a gesture of thanks for its service on Arctic conveys during the second war. As it happens, a ship on which FIL's brother served during the Korean war. During which, I remember him telling us, it had a large hole punched in its side. This repair not visible to the untrained eye.

Saturday, September 11, 2010

 

Nature notes

Been a very natural few days. Started off yesterday with my waking up to the sound of an owl flitting over the Chase Estate. Proper towit towhoo job. The second time this year, the second time since we have lived in Epsom. Birds I used to hear quite often in my childhood but then our house backed onto a large field fringed with woods. Then there was a heron sitting on top of one of the fir trees in the next door garden. Maybe it was eyeing up the newts in our pond. Followed up by FIL finding a large mushroom in someone's front garden on the way back from fetching the newspapers. After much study we decided that it was probably a common-or-garden horse mushroom. It did smell a bit of aniseed when broken but did not turn yellow, like the book says it should. Maybe a mutant. Then off to the canal at Wisley to see what was cooking there. One fish jumping out of the water, maybe six inches long. Lots of water boatmen. One snake swimming in the water, the first time I have seen such a thing. Silver grey and also about six inches long. Consensus was that it was a baby adder rather than a baby grass snake.

There was also a sewage farm at Wisley, a bit of a coincidence as we had only been saying a day or so ago that one does not often see the things. Had they been moved underground by some EC waste water directive or other? To which the answer, in part at least, turns out to be no.

Lunch at the Anchor. A large place which appeared to have been built in the mid-thirties and to which a very posh extension has recently been added. None of your white plastic. Proper exposed oak beam job, the sort of the thing that the National Trust owners of the neighbouring canal would probably approve of. Good class of young person serving, perhaps reflecting the poshness of this bit of Surrey. At the end of lunch discovered, as we were sitting outside, that if you lift up one of those up-side-down flower pots used as ash trays, you release a cloud of lingering evil smell. Presumably the evil smell leaches out of the fag ends, getting stronger over the hours, all ready for release by an inquisitive FIL who did not know that the thing was for.

On the way we had called in at a place called Dorich House, also built in the mid-thirties, for a Latvian sculptress and her Honourable English husband. Presumably he brought the money into the menage which paid for the house - £3,500 including the land at the time. Presumably fetch a million or so now, although we will never know because it has been taken on by Kingston University who use it for something or other and who open it from time to time as a museum. A large house built of brown brick with a relatively small garden. Super house for an arty couple with arty friends, with two very big & high rooms on the first floor - a reception room and the studio - a handsome flat on the second floor and a flat roof for raves and snoozes. Lots of her bronze figure & portrait sculpture which I found impressive, and some of her paintings which I found less so. Lots of Russian objects collected by the husband. Furniture, caviar spoons, various pots old and new and a bunch of icons from the 17th century to the present. These last being interesting to see close up, but not the sort of thing I would want on display particularly.

Flat roof was rather good and included a shelter under which one could eat. Great place for chilling out. Which led me to wonder why flat roofs, which were quite common in houses of this period, are not very common now? I would have thought that a properly built asphalt roof would last as long as a pointy roof and not require more maintenance particularly. You get the fun of the roof plus more usable space inside for a given height of house. So what's the catch?

We had a flat once which had an asphalt roof, from about the same time. The part which sloped, being the reverse of the pretend pointy roof which you saw from the road, was not too hot as the asphalt had flowed down hill a bit. But the flat part was OK apart from a few small volcanoes, presumably the product of hot summers. But one could deal with this by some suitable cover, as they have at Dorich.

Friday, September 10, 2010

 

Cod rules

Had a cod panic this lunchtime. Went to take the cod out of the oven to find the oven was switched off. What had I done? Had I managed to turn the oven off when I got confused about the buttons for the hot plates? Which confusion I did remember about. Vegetables all cooked and would not improve with standing. As it turned out, the hot blast when I decided to open up suggested that the oven had not been off long. Panic recedes. And as it turned out, cod excellent today. Not sure if that is down to it being eaten on Friday and so a day fresher than last week's Saturday or to my making sure that it got the full hour and a quarter - having thought that last week was a touch underdone.

Only thing that went wrong was that the cabbage was a touch overdone. I find it hard to time these summer cabbages, which go mushy very quickly. Despite looking like a pale green savoy.

Mood at lunch also lightened by the latest stroke in the drug wars. That is to say there is more or less a full page in the Guardian devoted to the criminality of criminalisation of drugs. The untold misery caused thereby. In Mexico not least. By one Simon Jenkins, probably the same Simon Jenkins whom I learnt yesterday is chairman of the National Trust. How much more mainstream, establishment, guardian of the national moral fibre could you get?

It continues to puzzle me why it has taken so long for the powers that be to wake up to this. What is stopping them? Powers that be are not usually terribly prudy when it comes to beer and skittles. Is it all down to those two big constituencies; one lot making lots of money out of supply and the other lot making lots of money out of control? Maybe the Tories will wake up to the fact that they are spending getting on for as much on a drugs policy which does not work as they want to spend on Trident. An excellent candidate for a cut.

One down side to legalisation occurs to me. If we make drugs legal, some people who presently trade in them will go legal. Become plumbers or something and pay taxes like other decent citizens. But some people in the drugs game are in it because they are habitual criminals for whom our current drugs policy represents easy pickings. So the worry is, what will such people turn to if this source of income is denied them? Will burglary become a big deal?

Sadly the Guardian blotted its copy book by running another piece about how the workers are going to starve when the fat cats get the cuts through in October. No recognition that I noticed that government has got to pull in its horns and that most of us are going to feel some pain. More on this when I manage to find out what proportion of the tax take comes from the fat cats.

Nearer home, big festival in the mosque-that-dare-not-say-its-name in Hook Road - the dare-not bit perhaps because the church across the way in Temple Road, whose church hall it used to be, is a bit touchy. Big turn out for the end of Ramadam with lots of people in very flashy and becoming clothes. Men and women, older more than younger. I wonder how many different parts of the world were represented there today?

Which brings one onto the idiot over the pond with the big moustaches. The liberal tradition is that you let idiots sound off because stopping them is the greater evil. Maybe all the papers which gave the chap big coverage - including the Guardian - believe that putting his idiocy up big will do more good than harm. That lots of white folk, who may not have thought about the subject before, will realise that he is an idiot or worse and that a bit more toleration and understanding might be a better idea. Who knows?

Thursday, September 09, 2010

 

Market forces reprised

Another sort of sub-optimal solution I have come across recently involves parking at one's flat. So one has a block of flats, built maybe forty years ago at a time when plenty of people did not have a car, particularly if the flat was handy to transport, and few had more than one. So the flats did not come with a huge amount of parking. Maybe one each plus a few spare for the better class of visitor. No need to bother with allocated places as there were never enough cars on the block to be a problem.

Times change though and there are often enough cars on the block now to be a problem. And some people, as always, make sure the system busts by being greedy, by having several cars. Maybe the odd van. So one comes up with allocated places and passes for legitimate parkers. The idea is that legitimate parkers put the pass on their dash when they park. These are inspected by the car parking police hired by the flat management people. The arrangment is that you don't pay the car parking police but they can keep all the fines they manage to collect. Which they do by clamping any car which does not have a valid pass displayed on the front offside of the dash and charging £200 to remove the clamp. Premium rate for silent hours, bank holidays and so on and so forth. An even better premium rate available on application if you need to get to work. Owning a valid pass no defence in the event of it being misplaced, near the dash or otherwise. Given that the car parking police on the ground get to put in their pocket 66% of what they collect, an excellent way to make sure that they are not snoozing away their shifts in the pub. And you probably get to be able to park in your own slot.

An arrangement which is not that different from that operated by local authorities on public highways. But it strikes me as very unpleasant and aggressive in a private parking area. Perhaps we have all got so unpleasant and aggressive ourselves that without this sort of scheme we are not going to stick to the parking rules. But not a good reflection on society as a whole, so I was pleased to see that one of the little carrots thrown to the LibDems to keep them sweet is a new law to ban such clamping on private premises by private operators.

And very similar arrangement to that operated by the banks. Reported on previously but whereby most personal banking services are free but if you break the rules, god help you. And enough of us manage to break the rules in one way or another for the banks to do very nicely thank you. A scheme which I believe the banks paid a lot of expensive lawyers a great deal of money to sustain in the High Courts against challenge from some gang or other. A gang which might have moved by the fact that the scheme is, in effect, an additional tax on the lower paid.

On a more cheerful note, the National Trust sent the BH, in her newly acquired status as a member, an invitation to their annual general meeting in a railway shed in Swindon. The invitation contained enough stuff for us to be able to work out that the National Trust has pots of governance. Would make the rule book for our local bowls club look very thin indeed; perhaps they are up there with the Wiki foundation, which I understand is big on governance too. A board of trustees, a council of councillors, a director general and a raft of area and subject committees, all with their own secretariats. As befits a voluntary organisation with an annual income of around £400m. Presumably the trust is awash with serious minded retired folk from offices who know all about committee work. Plus a certain amount of grass-roots activation from other serious minded retired folk who only make it to volunteer. As there are 60,000 of them, only a very small proportion are going to make it onto the committees. Hence the activation. Nicely presented annual report available from their website, which I would only fault on my not being able to find many statistics about employees and volunteers. Do they have a diversity officer? A picture of the council on the stroll in the garden looked very white.

 

Place of work

A snap of the building where I once used to work. No where near posh enough to have an office with a river view though. I was on the third floor, just inside the front door, in a shared office overlooking the central courtyard. But they did supply large government issue ash trays in those days. And a weekly towel, with soap. Bridge doesn't look quite right; presumably the one before the one that I knew.

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

 

I'm forever blowing bubbles. Not

Time to move from the bubble men (as we would have called them when I was a student) on to the coin department where I read in the DT that that National Mint are changing the recipe of 5p and 10p coins in a bid to save £5m a year. The only catch is that the change costs the slot machine industry - this including worthy things like parking meters as well as unworthy things like arcade machines - £50m or maybe even £100m. No doubt the National Association of Arcade Machine Operators (NAAMO) is laying it on a bit thick. But an example of how one outfit is able to transfer costs to another, with UK PLC as a whole being a loser.

Another example with which most of us are familiar is the way that help centre operators transfer costs to the general public. So in order that they can sweat their people good and keep their costs down, they have us sitting around on the end of a phone listening to some frightful music or other, interspersed with even more frightful messages. Waiting for their computer to decide that it is our turn, keeping our costs good and up. Once again, market forces do not come up with an obviously great result.

The New Labour (NL) answer would be regulation, perhaps an OffHello, an office for the regulation, legislation and interference with help desk operators. Headed up by some NL stalwart at perhaps £200,000 a year for services rendered to some plant in the NL garden. Which is not too clever but I have not got a better answer.

Yesterday to Vauxhall Bridge Road where we finally gain entrance to the church with the big bell tower, the one vaguely opposite Vincent Square, on the western side of the road. Near the Lord High Admiral. A place which I must have walked past hundreds of times but never managed to get into before. Despite being the church of St. James the Less (whatever that might signify apart from being smaller than something else), it is a Grade 1 listed building from the middle of the 19th century. Very impressive, fancy brick interior, gothic revival, with a lot of vaulting, fancy stone, glass and other ornament. Must have looked quite something when it was new, although quite a lot of the ornament is now looking a bit tired. Painted ceilings faded and patches of stained glass losing their stain. The inhabitants of the surrounding slums were presumably suitably uplifted by this arrival of the lord in their parish - although appearances would suggest that they have not been too keen on subscribing to the maintenance fund.

The amount of money spent on this sort of thing by churches of all denominations during the 19th century must have been prodigious. Presumably what drives RSPCC, RSPB, WWF and so on now.

Took in the Tate Proper on the way, where we had a sight of the husk of some fighting plane hanging upside down from the ceiling of one of the sculpture galleries. Very shabby it looked too. And they couldn't even manage to hang it down right; very badly placed. In case one wondered what on earth the point was, there was a helpful video in a side room with some lady arty - perhaps the author of the work - droning on about significance. Now I dare say that the charter of the Tate Proper includes displaying the work of contemporary arties. But do the trustees have to hang everything that is pushed through their letter box?

Luckily, there is plenty of good stuff there. So, for example, 'Our English Coasts' is back on the wall, having been missing last time we visited. But it seems to have got lighter, much lighter than the reproduction we bought when we last saw it. Has the thing been cleaned? Have they overdone it a bit? Still a great picture but it would be nice to know. Inspection of their elaborate web site did not reveal anything beyond teacher notes on the picture. Nothing about refurbishment. Don't seem to go in for 'contact' buttons. There was also a rather splendid Adam and Eve with exotic livestock from the very end of the 19th century which I had not noticed before and the name of the painter of which did not stick. Lots of good Millais.

Tuesday, September 07, 2010

 

More musings

Remembered this morning that there are a lot of apocalyptic films out there. Such things must scratch an important itch. Some focus on the apocalyptic threat - so we have Dustin Hoffman and the giant killer, life as we know it threatening virus from darkest Africa. Some focus on life after the deluge, often of the nuclear variety - so we have Kevin Costner wandering about a thinly populated but hot part of California mixing it with a sort of latter day Hells Angels. Some focus on the unfolding apocalypse - so we have 'The Day after Tomorrow', 'Deep Impact' and freeview offerings of that sort. In all the films in this genre that I have seen, the world survives and humans live on to fight another day. So one where they don't would be a new departure. But would it make any money?

And then there are the pervasive deluge myths from ancient times. With or without arks. Plus the Sodom and Gomorrah variant. The focus here being fresh start.

In between all this stuff, finally knocked off 'The Plumed Serpent'. Fair amount of skipping as there was a fair amount of lecturing and fake liturgy which I found a bit heavy. Even for me. But interesting, all the same. In part because it made me see some point in the Holy Trinity, something invented by the Greek strand of early Christianity and the cause of all kinds of trouble in the first 1,000 years or so of the Christian era. So the Holy Trinity states without attempting to resolve the central mystery of a being which is father, son and holy spirit all at the same time. A rather sexist formulation, but one of its time, the Greeks having lost their earlier enthusiasm for earth goddesses. An early version of three in one. Parts further east contributed two in one - until Mohammed put an end to that with his back-to-basics one is one and all alone.

Now Huxley and Lawrence, on the pair of whom I have been spending quality time over the last few months, had both dumped Christianity. Both fairly aggressively. But Huxley spent quality time on exploring the proper relation between mind and body, at one time thinking that the answer was a balance. So he focussed on the father and holy spirit part of the trinity. Lawrence, at least some of the time, thought that mind and body ought to be fused, doing away with that part of the trinity, but spent quality time on exploring the proper relation between person and person, mainly but by no means exclusively between male and female. So he focussed on the father and son part of the trinity. And going in for balance rather than fusion in this department. Fusion was deplored. Maybe, if Lawrence had not succumbed to TB at a relatively early age, he and Huxley might have jointly worked up a new trinity from their two dualities. Don't quite see how male and female can be worked into such a scheme though. Gives one too many permutations.

All put a bit crudely, as usual, but hopefully it serves to make the point.

But I can see that the shared interest in balance and fusion might be part of what had drawn them together. And perhaps no accident that they both got a bit mystical towards the end of their lives.

PS: Mr G. now moved to tell me about http://www.counterthreatinstitute.com/. Clearly does not go a bundle on all this mind body stuff. Much more into deluges.

Monday, September 06, 2010

 

Apocalyptic musings

The Newcastle Brown Ale at TB has changed batch and returned to normal flavour, without my ever having made contact with that part of the Heineken empire which looks after the ale's UK customers. Woke up this morning, presumably still tainted by the previous evening's tasting, to apocalyptic musings. Which went roughly as follows.

Between 1500 and 1600 GMT one Wednesday afternoon in the early Autumn, the sun faded and went out. Unlike in the film 'The Day after Tomorrow', which must have been aired many times over the last few years, the sun did not return bright and cheerful the next day. Some people in the days that followed thought that the problem was that no-one had been paying attention or sacrificing to Quetzalcoatl for far too long. Others thought that the end times foretold in Revelations II.iv were upon us. All that was needed to get on with them were the four horsemen of the Apocalypse. Some scientists pointed to the recent reversal of Planck's constant, which must have done serious damage to the fabric of space-time.

But that was later. At the time both Prime Minister Cameron and the Queen were taking their afternoon naps. Nervous aides wondered whether to wake them up. In the end, the Lord Mandelson stirred himself in retirement and managed to persuade the Gold Stick in waiting, Major General Sir Humphrey Bogart, KCMG Bart., that perhaps he ought to wake Her Majesty. Her Majesty, once fully awake and refreshed with a little Earl Gray, took decisive action. She phoned Prime Minister Cameron, by then also awake, and told him in no uncertain terms that this was not the time for coalition cabinets and that she was going to call a Privy Council for that same afternoon, at the Palace.

The people of London were getting a little restive, despite street lighting being brought on-stream a couple of hours early. Gold Stick got patrols from the Household Cavalry out on the streets to make sure that things stayed calm and that a quorum of Privy Councillors got through to the Palace from their clubs and other places of work. They also sent a horse for the Emeritus Professor of solar studies at University College, there being no time to reel in his Oxbridge colleagues.

The mood at the Council was rather sombre. The Chief of the Imperial General Staff explained that such sheltered accommodation as was available for VIPs had been much reduced since the end of the cold war, although it was lucky that the recently mooted further cuts had not yet been implemented. Much of it had been turned over to mushroom farms, the steady cool conditions being ideal. He could find maybe 2,000 places in the London area by 1600 the following afternoon. The chief of the VIPER secretariat explained that the National Grid should be able to keep going after a fashion, at least until the Russkies turned off the gas tap, which they probably would. They would be needing the stuff themselves. After that we would be onto rationing but there would be enough power to keep the sheltered accommodation and other essential services going for some years, provided that is that the change in temperature did not result in ice storms and such like damaging the network, which would be hard to mend in the dark. But he could not answer for the state of the population at large. The Emeritus Professor explained that the lapse of solar power was unprecedented. First thoughts were that we were experiencing a dark matter eclipse, with a large cloud of invisible dark matter occluding the sun, possibly the product of the recent supernova explosion in the constellation of Castor & Sugar. It was quite possible that the cloud would pass on and solar power would be restored. Somebody had also calculated that, in the absence of solar power, the surface temperature of the earth would cool at about the rate of 3.7C a day, with the fall slowing as the temperature reached around -130C, the temperature of the exterior which the hot interior could sustain.

Minister of Country, mindful of the awkward position of those in the country, wondered about the fate of our livestock. Minister of Agriculture thought that, in the absence of special measures, they would all be dead within 3 days. There was no sheltered accommodation for livestock. Crops would all be dead within 6 days, although with careful handling they might come back to life when the thaw came. So food supply situation not good.

Minister of Information thought that advice about how to keep warm ought to be broadcast to the nation while the nation still had working televisions and mobile phones. He thought that Prime Minister Cameron should broadcast to the nation as soon as possible. Advice about blankets and the safe use of barbecues as space heaters. Conservation of supplies without hoarding. Keep calm and stay at home. Keep tuned in to ITV3, the transmitter most likely to be able to keep going. Keep mobile phones on in case instructions are sent out that way. Keep use of Facebook to a minimum to give bandwidth to the emergency services. Best to keep Her Majesty in reserve for the moment. She agreed and he left the Council in order to set the necessary drafting work in motion.

And so the sorry situation unwound.

A few weeks later there were very few people left alive in less developed parts of the world. Things were a bit better in more developed parts of the world where power supplies were holding up after a fashion. Quite a few rodents tucked away in cosy corners, but virtually no large animals (apart from us that is). No cows, pigs or sheep, apart from the few that the VIPER secretariat had manage to ARK against the thaw. Enough to build a new stock but nowhere enough to eat. Oceans starting to freeze and glaciers starting to grow again. Dutch elm disease and the sudden death syndrome (oak) extinct. Couldn't keep up with the change.

A few weeks after that we were down to the bacteria which thrive in hot springs at the bottom of the cooling oceans. At which point the cloud of dark matter did indeed move on and everything could start all over again. Well not all over as we did have the bacteria, so that saved about a billion years of evolution.

Perhaps one could make a cartoon?

Having got that off my chest, we proceeded to Nymans Gardens at Pease Pottage. The best gardens I remember visiting. Large place with enough room for formal gardens, shrub and tree gardens and woods. Lots of unusual trees and interesting plantings. Interesting topiary, mostly of a non-bestial variety. Lots of big trees, including the tallest tree - a redwood - in West Sussex. Pity about the buildings, mostly a bit silly. And, because FIL had brought along his rollator, he got in free. Very happy bunny.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?